Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 52

Thread: fuel usage and litre/100km

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    599
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    Yeah.

    Come back when you're getting 38/100
    Why is yours so high? Is ishe sick?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Mornington Peninsula, Victoria
    Posts
    589
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have been checking mine for ages now (TD5) & I get a woeful 12-13.5 on average. I have no idea why it's so bad. I have a 2"lift with bull bar & AT's but that shouldn't make it that bad. Have spent many hours on the net trying to find ways to improve it

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Logan
    Posts
    133
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hmm - he got better fuel consumption not worse - 9l/100km to 7l/100km which is an improvement.

    He is saying 7 km per ltr, not 7 ltr per 100km.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well it's a 4.6V8 to start. I don't know, last thing to do is swap ECU after that buy shares in BP

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 3lud13 View Post
    But as I'm still getting used to how much fuel it goes through I am still recording how far i get between filling up. It usually works out about 9ish litres per 100km but last night when I filled up and did the maths it worked out about 7 litre per 100.
    Quote Originally Posted by landiematt View Post
    Hmm - he got better fuel consumption not worse - 9l/100km to 7l/100km which is an improvement.

    He is saying 7 km per ltr, not 7 ltr per 100km.
    I read the original post as quoted above as l/100km. Landiematt I am not sure where you are getting km/litre from.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Point Cook, VIC
    Posts
    2,472
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    Yeah.

    Come back when you're getting 38/100
    I think your vehicle has an addiction problem!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Hawthorn
    Posts
    215
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by landiematt View Post
    Hmm - he got better fuel consumption not worse - 9l/100km to 7l/100km which is an improvement.

    He is saying 7 km per ltr, not 7 ltr per 100km.
    As gary pointed out I ended up getting better economy last night which seemed strange have only fueled up 3 times so is hard to know where the error is yet but it just seemed very stange.
    On highway driving home after purchase I got 9.79ltr/100km
    bit of highway and around town driving got 9.46ltr/100km
    and then last night with offroad and highway driving was 7.50ltr/100km

    I understand that in a diesel you don't particularly get better fuel economy on the highway and given the disco 1 size thats understandable, plus I have heard the mileage between highway and town doesn't vary as much with diesel as it does petrol.
    But then with last nights off road adventure I would have expected it to go up to high 9 or even 10 litres however it ended up going down and considering how much mud we had to push through and with some very steep slow climbs it seems strange to have gone down.

    I'm just trying to understand why so as to make trip planning in the future easier as not much worse than having to cut your trip short due to not allowing enough fuel

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I suspect it will end the end be a measuring issue however a 300tdi will be out of its comfort zone at freeway speeds - will be on the downward side of the power curve and likely to be close or if not on the downward side of the torque curve.

    Depending on the terrain and if not a lot of gunning was required, when offroad the engine may very well be operating at its optimum toque particularly if you are going slow and just chugging along.

    Sand work and very steep climbs will definitely use more fuel but more moderate 4wding at slower 30kph type speeds may very well give better fuel consumption.

    All I would do is take note and see if it is consistent in the future.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Logan
    Posts
    133
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sorry I thought you were referring to bushy.

    My bad


    Matt

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Best ever on mine with stock size tyres was 9.08L/100 and that was a measured economy run where we all filled from the same pump before and after.
    I would guess my normal city ueage would be closer to 12L/100 but that is on 32"tyres and 3" lift .
    Oddly enough my last trip away with the AULRO group to Avoca i got really good mileage coming home @ 110KPH towing a camper trailer at about 600kg.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!