Sales guy for the maxi drive said with increased revs you could push closer to 60hp. Flow rates for the Cross brand pump are cross referenced to rpm, from 1000 to 3000 so Kreecha's idea of 2000 would put him mid range with some extra capacity.
Printable View
Sales guy for the maxi drive said with increased revs you could push closer to 60hp. Flow rates for the Cross brand pump are cross referenced to rpm, from 1000 to 3000 so Kreecha's idea of 2000 would put him mid range with some extra capacity.
If they recon 60hp is ok, well........seems a lot tho.
So what is it? Firewood? Last 'real' one I played with didn't have a splitter (was using ex timber mill scantling), but used a input conveyer loaded via a Bell log handler, to feed into a harvesting head off a feller/buncher, cut to length via PLC control over the input conveyer, then onto a output conveyer to a stockpile or truck. Basically built with mostly leftover bits and driven with a 6-354 Perkins.......interesting project.
Hi,
I would no want to keep the AC. I am dreaming of building one of these 3000/4000 Bar Saw Firewood Processors (no loading deck) on a D1 chassis. Also means I do not have to worry about cutting the floor. There won't be a floor :D Or a body...
I agree all the other parts will be expensive. Plus maintenance.
Some parts I can make to reduce labour; hoses, tanks fabrication etc.
Some parts I have to buy; hydraulics (valves, valve block, PRV, Gg's, motors, rams etc), Chain.
Oh and you refer to weight. I had considered weight to be an issue, but loading a d1 chassis with 800kg of hydraulics and steel... Then a tonne of tree... I will make concessions :)
I'm pretty sure the hydraulic winch needs a closed centre spool to remain locked when not functioning.
Cheers, Adam.
I agree. I have to continue my study to find a suitable setup.
Once again; I agree. To lessen your concern I aim to run 16kw off the front of the crank via a toothed belt to one pump, and 32kw through the t/case. That being said I have to be wary of many differing factors such as;
-over loading,
-oil condition,
-oil temperature,
-oil volume,
-additional t/case wear,
-engine glazing.
There is much more I must also be wary off, and I am happy to further explain if you desire however that is outside the scope of my initial query.
Cheers, Adam.
I hope the other link I posted previously assists with detailing what I want to achieve. That said....
I also want to include 2 hydraulic winches, a mulched, hydraulic steering, and a stump grinder.
:)
I will be sustainably felling forests designed for fuelwood production.
I have never heard of agrichar production. Googling.
Cheers :)
Hi Slug,
Heat is a concern.
Should be interesting. I've done a lot of research in the last 12mths regarding this subject, and it should be interesting to see how much more study I can do prior to finding a problem that is unmanageable.
Managing heat is (relatively) easy to conquer.
LT230 PTO drives not designed for outputting as much power as I require is a show-stopper.Luckily I haven't arrived there yet :)
Cheer's Adam.
PLC's are abit above my desire of a full-mechanical-fluid power system.
However; I do realise the benefit of, and understand the simplicity of, wiring in a few limit switches to provide some and/or sequences.
I did google a perkins 6-354... I couldn't find an engine capacity. I could find power and torque though and they were almost identical to a 300TDI.
Thanks Rick for looking in.
Closed centre spool valve is normally used in a system where no oil flow is desired through the valve in the neutral position, usually a closed circuit system using a load sensed/ pressure compensated piston pump or accumulator system.
Most, but not all, hydraulic winches tend to use some sort load holding (overcentre) valve on the motors work ports to stop the motor when there is no oil flow. With an open circuit system (common gear/vane pump), theory says use a motor spool ( both valve work ports open to tank when in neutral), but in most cases a standard cylinder spool ( both work ports closed in neutral) works ok.
Consider your heat carefully if your working in high ambient temps. Its generally accepted that the tank should be 3 times the oil flow (so 100l/min oil flow = 300L tank) which is usually quite hard to achieve in a mobile system. 1:1 should be workable if everything is sized to minimize unnecessary heat.
A lot of oil cooler manufactures won't warrant there coolers when used in curcuits containing hydraulic cylinders (spike pressures in return lines when retracting cylinders). Check valves across the cooler ports can sometimes be of help with this.