I don't see a mechanical problem with it - but I fail to see the advantage either.
The use of needle roller bearings to allow slow intermittent movement where there is no requirement for low friction seems to be a bit of overkill.
John
Printable View
I don't see a mechanical problem with it - but I fail to see the advantage either.
The use of needle roller bearings to allow slow intermittent movement where there is no requirement for low friction seems to be a bit of overkill.
John
I don't like the fact that it is all held together by 4 snap rings and I have found that needle roller bearings where there is limited movement (rotation) tend to wear quickly in one area, Regards Frank.
Do you mean like the one that was prototyped for one of the forward control series that had a propshaft in the center and a much bigger version of a uj with the center hollowed out for it to mont in?
Worked well except the outer "uj" tended to bind
Sent from my SM-G920I using AULRO mobile app
Like this one?
http://www.4wdonline.com/Mil/LandRov...d.trailer.html
I was envisaging a similiar trailer, but with two sepetate, yet same style, universal joint coupled shafts.
Aaron
I think I'd prefer a treg coupling.
I think the end loading, ie forward/ backward vibration caused by a corrugated road would soon see off a solid mounted UJ system like that. needle rollers in general dont like that type of impacts. Apart from that cant see a need.
I doubt that the vibration from corrugations etc would be a problem with a universal joint - failures of these on propeller shafts are not a common result of operation on corrugated roads where the tyres skipping on corrugations transfer the vibration to the drive train. And half axles with two U-joints and no slip joint have been used without problems as suspension links - Rover 2000 from memory. In this use, the vibration loads would be at least as large.
John