Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Which Tyres BFG or Coopers or Claws

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    North West Tasmania
    Posts
    869
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Which Tyres BFG or Coopers or Claws

    I am need for new tyres.

    I have decided on 265/75 Mud Tyres.

    Can anyone advise out of BFG, COOPERS STT or CLAWS.

    My series 2 Disco TD5 has 2" OME Lift and ECU upgrade

    regards
    Piddler

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go BFG, i have Coopers & OME on my DII or Wranglers but not Coopers.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney, Northern Beaches
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go the BF's ... best muddy on the market!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Warburton, Victoria
    Posts
    4,693
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go the BFG.
    Easy to get and a good tyre....

    But like all Muds they work well in wet stuff but clay based stuff they dont clear quick enough...

    But for 90% of people they are fine....

    Steve

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Mullion Creek, NSW. 2800
    Posts
    870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Originally posted by sclarke
    Go the BFG.
    Easy to get and a good tyre....

    But like all Muds they work well in wet stuff but clay based stuff they dont clear quick enough...

    But for 90% of people they are fine....

    Steve
    Totaly agree, I found them great on wet clay as well as rock steps and black mud, these are 265/75/16


    Cheers
    Bryce

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Really I think BFG and Coopers are about on par with each other. I have had both. The reason I bought Coopers this time was they were $50-80 per tyre cheaper than BFG MT's in Kalgoorlie. Baja Claws are going to cost you significantly more and are more targeted at hard core off roading, not totally suitable for on road regular use.

  7. #7
    MickG's Avatar
    MickG is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, Qld
    Posts
    2,737
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Can't comment on Coopers but I run 265/75r16 on my D2 with an OME 2" lift and they perform excellently. I also have the remapped ECU and I also ended up putting in 4.11 gears as I found the standard gearing with the larger tyres to be too fast off road when needing crawlability. Standard gears are also noticably taller on road and a bit slower to pull off the line. I know a few people who do run the standard gears and larger tyres and are happy but just ask yourself how and when you want your rig to perform. I have been setting mine up for off road capability so the 4.11's were a must if I was to stick with the larger tyres.

    Hope this helps

    Mick
    '99 Manual TD5 D2.......heap of money spent on it and it has ended

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It seems BF's have fixed some of there compounding problems of a couple of years back and now manufacturing good solid performers again [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif[/img]

    I have 235/85R16 (same height as a 265, just not as wide) Goodyear Wrangler MT/R's, work well on rocks, loose gravel and on all types of terrain bar mud where they're on par with a BF all-terrain due to the tread design. Plus Goodyears have risen in price signifigantly since I bought mine in 2003 (now for my size $285 on average a tyre 8O )

    For lots of mud work, Claws are good performers but like Craig mentioned, they are more 'hardcore' and don't suit all occasions IMO.

    Make the best choice to suit your needs and you should be pleased with your outcome.

    Good luck with it.

    Trav

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go BFG but I would question the size.... A 235 is the largest I would want to go.

    Large tyres give a large surface area. Fine for floatation in sand and snow but in most mud conditions you need to dig through the mud to get to the harder stuff underneath. The narrower tyre lets you dig through but if you need the larger surface area you can just run at a lower pressure.

    My 2p worth.

    Mark.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Originally posted by camel_landy
    Go BFG but I would question the size.... A 235 is the largest I would want to go.

    Large tyres give a large surface area. Fine for floatation in sand and snow but in most mud conditions you need to dig through the mud to get to the harder stuff underneath. The narrower tyre lets you dig through but if you need the larger surface area you can just run at a lower pressure.

    My 2p worth.

    Mark.
    This is why I fitted 235's not the wider 265's. We were out on a trip recently and a mate has 265's on his Rangie and I have 235's and found as you stated, my 235's dug through the terrain to maintain traction better than his 265's which ecventually diod but too some wheelspin (not always good in out enviro-pschotic society )

    Everyone like wide, wide and wider tyres but the trend has changed a bit from what I have seen out on the tracks. More 4wd's have tall but narrower tyres these days for the reasons that you have mentioned.

    Trav

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!