There is definitely an advantage in older diesel injection. The new ones are very sensitive to water. Cheers
My 2012 Puma doesnt have the DPF either. I think it was the MY14 models onwards that had them fitted but I will stand corrected if I am wrong. Mine does 11-12 L/100 atm. Running in a new long range tank so we will see if i can get 1000km out of the tank
1964, S2a SWB "Ralph"
1977, S3 SWB "Smeg" (Gone)
1996 D1 300tdi auto (Gone)
1973 Rangie Classic (Gone)
2012, 110 (Series 12) Puma "The Tardis"
1962 109" Tray Back "Ernie"
1998 D1 300tdi (Dizzy)
2017 Kawasaki Versys 1000
You must now cut down the tallest tree in the forest... With... A HERRING!!!!!
Nope. No DPF on a '15![]()
I've got a theory on fuel economy,the Tdi gets good economy but it does feel steeper grade hills so you tend to sit back and let it clamber over,the TDCi doesn't feel hills so you leave it in 6th and race over,same for cruising,the Tdi is comfortable around 100-110km/hr,the TDCi any speed so you do any speed,like 120,with a camper on the back.For that reason the Td5 and more so TDCi will never match the Tdi for economy,thats my theory anyway.
Just changing course here slightly then......
If there's no DPF until probably the last few, then, other than the engine size, what is the difference between the 2, if any?
Is the 2.4lt ECU more easily remapped than the 2.2? Does the 2.2lt ECU have more security in it that makes it harder to remap (if it can be done at all)?
MY 2015,..No DPF Filter and combined economy approx 10l per 100km
Defender MY 2015 110
Adventures so far!!
Cape York 2016 Bloomfield,OTT(Gunshot), Frenchmans,Border Ranges, Fraser Isl,Moreton Isl, Tassie(pyengana Jeep track & Montezuma falls).1770
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks