Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 58

Thread: VW ordered to set record straight.

  1. #41
    DiscoMick Guest

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    3960
    Posts
    1,161
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post

    There are many things I could say in response to that post, but this thread is not in Current Affairs, so politics is not allowed.


    Sorry to sound a bit earnest, but I'm getting jack of some people (not you) who just flatly refuse to face the facts.

    G`day ,

    can you explain the LR technical basis the thread exists on and why you placed it here .

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    3960
    Posts
    1,161
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    Hi PLR, and does it matter?

    It's still a good read!

    G`day ,

    the number and variety of posters would suggest not .

    Good read is relative .

    Appreciate your reply

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,134
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    Honestly?.
    Hmmm, i cant find the podcast i was listening too that was talking about it. I was thinking it was Dr Karl. Another article I read suggested improvemnts of 9.9% for Australian clean coal. Its a massive polluter.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  6. #46
    DiscoMick Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by PLR View Post
    G`day ,

    can you explain the LR technical basis the thread exists on and why you placed it here .
    Vehicle emissions are a technical issue. I couldn't find the original VW thread. The actual article was about a judge saying VW had misrepresented what the government authority had said about the VW software update.
    The thread has gone a bit offtrack - sorry. Vehicle emissions are important for both health and climate change.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Hmmm, i cant find the podcast i was listening too that was talking about it. I was thinking it was Dr Karl. Another article I read suggested improvemnts of 9.9% for Australian clean coal. Its a massive polluter.
    Hi Slunnie, about two months back, I was watching a gabfest on Skytv and Josh Frybenberg was debating with some SA minister, about the “short falls” in SA’s pathetic electricity setup.


    Josh pointed out how some times SA produced much of it’s required power and on other times, worst case, they needed as much as 95% to be supplied from interstate power providers.


    The SA minister didn't argue the point, nor did he have a answer when Josh asked why SA demolished their last power station when they knew that doing so would mean they could no longer meet their power requirements.


    Now we all know politicians “never” lie!!!!!!!!

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    The thread has gone a bit offtrack - sorry. Vehicle emissions are important for both health and climate change.
    Actually Mick, I'm the one who should apologies, not you.

    I'm responsible for the deviation!

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    3960
    Posts
    1,161
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    Vehicle emissions are a technical issue. I couldn't find the original VW thread. The actual article was about a judge saying VW had misrepresented what the government authority had said about the VW software update.
    The thread has gone a bit offtrack - sorry. Vehicle emissions are important for both health and climate change.
    G`day , thanks for your reply .

    While i can`t agree with all the logic of your reply that doesn`t matter .

    I`d suggest the reason for not being able to find a VW Emissions thread is because previously they have been in General Chat .

    It matters even less knowing it is not of concern to others what is in Tech as i naively put an idea forward earlier in the year which made sense to none .

    I was interested to know if it was mistakenly put here or not and you have kindly answered that for me .

    Cheerio

  10. #50
    DiscoMick Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    Hi Slunnie, about two months back, I was watching a gabfest on Skytv and Josh Frybenberg was debating with some SA minister, about the “short falls” in SA’s pathetic electricity setup.


    Josh pointed out how some times SA produced much of it’s required power and on other times, worst case, they needed as much as 95% to be supplied from interstate power providers.


    The SA minister didn't argue the point, nor did he have a answer when Josh asked why SA demolished their last power station when they knew that doing so would mean they could no longer meet their power requirements.


    Now we all know politicians “never” lie!!!!!!!!
    You might like to do some research and find which SA government sold their power plant. Here's a hint - that privatization was not done by the current SA government, which is trying to fix the mess it inherited.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!