Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: 300tdi versus td5 in torque at idle speed?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    417
    Total Downloaded
    0

    300tdi versus td5 in torque at idle speed?

    Hi

    Just out of curiosity, I' was talking to a guy who drives a 130 td5 dualcab ute for state rail (the ones set up for running along the rail line), and he was saying his only gripe with the vehicle was having to rev the guts out of it to take off. they permanently have it loadedto the max about 1.5 ton, Thats a fair bit on the back to take off with if on soft ground or on a steep slope. but if using low range youwouldn't think reving the crap out of it would be necesary. I know with the 300 motor i can reverse a 1.2t caravan up our driveway which is pretty steep on dead idle (foot off the pedal), is their a difference hear between the two engines at low revs? The td5 has more torque at revs going by specs, but just wondering now about real lugging power right down low?

    Cheers Sumo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Launceston, TAS
    Posts
    853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It would be interesting to hear as the 300Tdi has such a rep for being gutless.

    Thing is I can't believe how close to impossible stalling a 300tdi is off road (in high as well as low range)

    Our previous 2.8TD Jackaroo stalled a lot earlier than what the 300tdi will

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    417
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cookiesa View Post
    It would be interesting to hear as the 300Tdi has such a rep for being gutless.

    Thing is I can't believe how close to impossible stalling a 300tdi is off road (in high as well as low range)

    Our previous 2.8TD Jackaroo stalled a lot earlier than what the 300tdi will
    Thats whats got me thinking mate, if i revved the daylights out of mine taking off with a load some thing would fly to bits for sure, not necesary.

    Sumo

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, outer South East
    Posts
    2,283
    Total Downloaded
    0
    300TDi is a nice reliable donk but don't believe it is better than a TD5. I have driven both. If it wasn't for the TD5 harness/ECU problems I would say no contest.
    Last edited by waynep; 3rd February 2007 at 06:35 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Close enough to their Shire to smell the dirty Hobbit feet
    Posts
    8,059
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sumo them Highrails have a lot of weight on them the rail running gear and hydraulics on them would easily way over a ton, then the weight of a 130 crew cab, then the 1.5 ton on the back. It's a lot of weight for a little engine to pull up hills.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yass NSW
    Posts
    7,239
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Can't help as mine is converted to Auto with a high stall converted so you rev it anywhere for 2000-3000 on take of. It does get up and move even when loaded though!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    417
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dobbo View Post
    Sumo them Highrails have a lot of weight on them the rail running gear and hydraulics on them would easily way over a ton, then the weight of a 130 crew cab, then the 1.5 ton on the back. It's a lot of weight for a little engine to pull up hills.

    Yeah, your right mate wasn't thinking about the weight of that rail running gear!!, Jap stuff probably wouldn't take off at all ,

    Cheers.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,505
    Total Downloaded
    0
    well I know for a fact that a loaded TD5 110 quite happilly pulls a fully loaded disco on a car trailer from albury to melbourne quite happily...

    no low range take offs (well except when I was getting out of the camp site and wanted slow speed for manouvering)
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IMO, the Td5 is a lot easier to stall than the 300Tdi.
    I only really drive brand newies so maybe they get better with age.
    Scott

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    417
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    well I know for a fact that a loaded TD5 110 quite happilly pulls a fully loaded disco on a car trailer from albury to melbourne quite happily...

    no low range take offs (well except when I was getting out of the camp site and wanted slow speed for manouvering)

    But thats all down hill going that way!!

    Seriously on dead idle will they push & pull weight?

    Cheers.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!