Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 53

Thread: Castor Correction - swivels or radius arms

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by oldzook View Post
    Yep your spot on. That's all I was pointing out, is that by not putting in the second bend it would be encouraging the vibration issue. They are on their limit from bog standard and any further modifications will only exacerbate that.
    they aint on the limits but they are near the optimal angles..

    ujs will drive though a bigger angle than a CV buuut...

    1. as ujs get more bent their efficiency goes down, Cv's not quite so much
    2. as Ujs get more bent they introduce driveline speed oscilations, cvs dont
    3. as Ujs get more bent the wear quicker, cvs not quite to so much
    4. Ujs are cheap, Cvs aint
    5. Ujs dont mind water and dust Cvs DO
    6. Changing a pair of ujs is an hours work on a good day.. CVs.....

    From memory the maximum nominal angle for a Uj is about 30 degrees
    lets say a CV can go to 40

    when the cv hits 40 degress that it any more and your risking snapping it they uj might go onto say 50 degrees (to pick numbers that sound about right) but as you go past 30 degrees your increasing wear and increasing power loss through the joint..

    If you get real lucky you might be able to trick the nominal driveline oscilations out of your shaft by offsetting the propshaft slip joint so the yokes are out of phase with each other, but good luck on that front.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Island
    Posts
    1,254
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Defender200Tdi View Post
    Yes, I agree. But I suspect on the standard setup for a Landrover, they aren't even parallel to start with. Wasn't this the reason Landrover came up with the out of phase bodge for the uni joints at the front? In any case, lifting the suspension probably just makes a dodgey arrangement even worse.

    Paul
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    they aint on the limits but they are near the optimal angles..

    ujs will drive though a bigger angle than a CV buuut...

    .
    Sorry that wasn't quite worded clearly. What I meant is wot you said.
    I meant that LR prop shafts are right on the edge of giving vibration problems, ah la setting the joints out of phase as Defender200Tdi had said. Yes, anybody who's played with IFS trying to get more travel has very quickly found the limits of the range of movement of their CVs for sure.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    what sort of angle is the bottom mount for the front shock on??
    this is another ''to do '' job, once ive finalised my spring heights and rates..



    cheers phil

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    At the White Motor Corporation plant in Brisbane,we went to a lot of trouble using a level slab, protractor sets, engineers levels, plumb bobs, centres, measuring tapes, wedges, shims to ensure that trucks had equal angle driveshafts, tandem drives square to the chassis, and to the front axle, and equal overall and internal wheelbases each side. A truck could not leave the plant until this was done and measurements recorded on the vehicle build sheet. Try doing this on your LR and be rewarded by improvements in driveline life, performance, and lack of vibration.
    URSUSMAJOR

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    59
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discowhite View Post
    this is another ''to do '' job, once ive finalised my spring heights and rates..



    cheers phil
    Looks about the same as mine! Suppose I will have to cut an reweld the bottom spring mounting plate!

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,138
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    Yes, indeed. Quoted verbatim from Qld. Transport " The welding, chrome plating, heating or bending of axles, suspension and steering components, as a method of repair or alteration, is not permitted".

    Such an alteration or repair technically renders the vehicle unroadworthy.

    Think of unscrupulous insurers who love to find an excuse to reject a claim, or slick lawyers apportioning blame in a damages case. "Dangerous, unroadworthy, illegally modified vehicle, irresponsible 4WD hoon". "Your Honour, we ask substantial damages and a period of imprisonment".
    Exactly. Its probably a better method to lift, change the front propshaft over to a DC shaft with the DC at the transfer to sort the vibrations and use slotted steering balls to correct the caster.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,138
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    1. as ujs get more bent their efficiency goes down, Cv's not quite so much
    2. as Ujs get more bent they introduce driveline speed oscilations, cvs dont
    3. as Ujs get more bent the wear quicker, cvs not quite to so much
    4. Ujs are cheap, Cvs aint
    5. Ujs dont mind water and dust Cvs DO
    6. Changing a pair of ujs is an hours work on a good day.. CVs.....
    Also the more angle you put into a CV, the weaker it becomes.
    Last edited by Slunnie; 5th May 2007 at 04:22 PM.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,138
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by oldzook View Post
    I believe it is this plane that the included angle is critical.


    A double cardan joint is basically 2 universal joints coupled in close proximity.
    A constant velocity joint is different again.
    The Yanks call a Double Cardin joint a CV joint, and they seem to call CV joint Birfs or something.

    I also understand its good practice to not run unis at 0 degrees but just slightly off this to keep the bearings in them moving and prevent pitting.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    2,382
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LROV90 View Post
    Hi,

    Having now lifted my 90 about 3 inches I need to correct my castor, thats now sitting at about -1 deg. I have already fitted both front and rear d/c shafts to get rid of most of the vibrations. I don't wont to really move the pinion angle from where it is now as it suits the d/c shaft fine - making corrected swivels the best bet. However the front springs and shocks are sitting on a fair angle as the diff has rotated foward so I wouldn't mind correcting this also - making radius arms the go!

    Suggestions??
    Wot the D/C shafts cost ya and where did you get em..TIA

  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    22
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    The Yanks call a Double Cardin joint a CV joint, and they seem to call CV joint Birfs or something.

    I also understand its good practice to not run unis at 0 degrees but just slightly off this to keep the bearings in them moving and prevent pitting.
    If you end up angling the pinion that high to get the "0 degree" angle, make sure you compensate with added oil level in the diff, otherwise you could end up with pinion bearings that aren't getting lubricated anymore. One easy way to "overfill" the diff is to park the truck on a significant hill and top off (piinted down hill for the rear diff, uphill for the front, obviously).

    P.S. -- A lot of guys do this with the T-Case as well to provide better oiling to the failure prone input gear, mainshaft spline wear area.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!