Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Disco 1 3.9 V8

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    26
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Smile Disco 1 3.9 V8

    can any person out in AULRO tell me how many horse power a Disco 1 3.9 V8 has this could help me greatly.
    thanks in advance
    Cheers Woz

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    132kw
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #3
    Rovernaut Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by WOZ24 View Post
    can any person out in AULRO tell me how many horse power a Disco 1 3.9 V8 has this could help me greatly.
    thanks in advance
    Cheers Woz
    Sorry don't know but some of our Discos on here have the Equine flu and have less horse power than others.


    sorry couldn't help myself
    Last edited by Rovernaut; 21st November 2007 at 06:01 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Warburton, Victoria
    Posts
    4,693
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Neeeeigh

  5. #5
    RonMcGr Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    132kw
    Good lord!
    No small wonder my 97 SE7 V8 is a slug pulling our caravan. The AUIII Falcon 6, does it so much better, however the stability of the LRD far surpasses the Ford. Weight is an important issue with a tow motor.

    Pity rover did not have a 'gutsy' motor

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RonMcGr View Post
    Good lord!
    No small wonder my 97 SE7 V8 is a slug pulling our caravan. The AUIII Falcon 6, does it so much better, however the stability of the LRD far surpasses the Ford. Weight is an important issue with a tow motor.

    Pity rover did not have a 'gutsy' motor
    You are confusing horsepower with torque - oversimplyfying it, horse power gives top speed but torque gives pulling power. The disco v8, like many 4wd engines has sacrificed power for low down torque - diesels have good pulling power (torque) but relatively low horse power (top speed).

    If you have a problem pulling your caravan you need to look at improving the torque characteristics for towing rather than power - though again oversimplyfying things, the two are linked.

    Gazz
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IIRC...

    186 BHP
    260 lb ft of torque.

    M

  8. #8
    RonMcGr Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    You are confusing horsepower with torque - oversimplyfying it, horse power gives top speed but torque gives pulling power. The disco v8, like many 4wd engines has sacrificed power for low down torque - diesels have good pulling power (torque) but relatively low horse power (top speed).

    If you have a problem pulling your caravan you need to look at improving the torque characteristics for towing rather than power - though again oversimplyfying things, the two are linked.

    Gazz
    Hi Gazz,

    I am aware of that

    2002 Falcon 143Kw @ 4500rpm
    362Nm @ 2750rpm

    1997 3.9V8i 132Kw @ 4700rpm
    320Nm @ 2600rpm

    The 4 litre Falcon wins and also is a lot lighter.

    However an engine change could be a good idea.

    4.6ltr V8 Rover.
    166Kw @ 4750rpm
    407Nm @ 2600rpm.

    Now that IS a gutsy motor

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Ron - my brother has a Mark 10 and a 420G for parts (only difference being the chrome stripe on the 420). Now they are engines with grunt - they haul such a big heavy car nicely.

    Cheers

    PS. The DII has more grunt that the D1 owing to quite a few subtle and some not so subtle engine and engine management (and flow) changes.

    Cheers

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dalby
    Posts
    4,011
    Total Downloaded
    0
    According to Redbook
    All base model 4 door manual V8s

    1993 3.5
    115kw @ 4750rpm
    ??nm
    1928kg kerb weight

    1993 3.9
    134kw @ 4750rpm
    ??nm
    1905kg

    1994 D1 update
    134kw @ 4750rpm
    304nm @ 2600rpm
    1905 kg

    1998 D1
    134kw @ 4750rpm
    304 @ 2600rpm
    1899kg

    1999 DII
    132kw @ 4750rpm
    320nm @ 2600rpm
    2010kg

    2004 DIIa
    136kw @ 4750rpm
    340nm @ 2600rpm
    2095kg

    So the difference between a 1994 D1a and a 2004 DIIa is 2kw, 36nm and 190kg. Does the power more than make up for the weight or is it just how the power is delivered that makes the difference?

    The DIIa has a very slightly better torque to weight ratio. Virtually the same.
    Last edited by Utemad; 22nd November 2007 at 09:43 AM. Reason: fixed a number

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!