CUBIC INCHES
Yeah - on paper the new engine appears to be lacking - but drive it before you pass judgment - it lacks nothing - it is the perfect engine for a Defender.
2.4l 4 cylinders suits me fine.
Less fuel consumption - which people ARE going to start caring about more and more, and only 4 x most of the complicated stuff to go wrong.
CUBIC INCHES
Yeah - on paper the new engine appears to be lacking - but drive it before you pass judgment - it lacks nothing - it is the perfect engine for a Defender.
2007 Defender 110
2017 Mercedes Benz C Class. Cabriolet
1993 BMW R100LT
2024 Triumph Bonneville T120 Black
Dougal
Boost has it's place and allowed diesel engines to meet some of the higher emission controls in Europe and North America, although in doing so it puts a little more stress on the engine, however when is 2.4 litres of boosted capacity the equal of the Nissan 4.2 litres of boosted capacity for example.
What I don't really understand is why didn't they standardise the TDV6 across the whole range of LR products or at least offer it as a third option?
Diana
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
I reckon that the TdV6 is a very expensive low volume premium engine vs the transit which is very large volume therefore cheap.What I don't really understand is why didn't they standardise the TDV6 across the whole range of LR products or at least offer it as a third option?![]()
In Uk nobody cares about highway performance and fuel is much more expensive than here.
Another example of the Japanese caring about Australia(V8 diesel, large tanks ) and the Poms not caring at all.
Regards Philip A
Phillip
I would tend to agree with you, however adding the TDV6 as an option to the Defender range would require only minimal additional tooling and increase the volume of what you describe as a very expensive premium engine. It would be like the Series 3 Land Rover 2.3 petrol being sold at the same time as they were selling Series 3 Stage 1 V8's 2 versions of essentially the same Land Rover.
I would be satisfied to buy a 2008 Defender 130 TDV6 at a premium price, after all experience is showing us that the Defenders are holding their value in the long term far better than the Discoveries.
I guess it is a question we should ask the new owners next year.
Diana
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
I just purchased a Nissan Cab Chassis for work. Had a quote on the six litre diesel, but when purchasing could only get the new common rail 3.0L 4cyl. So I drove it and it goes fine. They are not a patch on the TdV6. Still they go fine and this one will cover most of Western QLD heavily loaded. My 300Tdi does not go quite as well but does go anywhere I wish and heavily loaded. I guess if I had a larger motor I would still be looking for more!! They are all Ok, in my opinion.
I guess it does not matter as the 6cyl is not available now.
Less fuel consumption, not necessarily. I am quite happy with the performance of the Td5 most of the time, and off road the engine size really is about the least important factor.
Towing is a different matter though. When I am loaded up with the camper trailer on the Td5 really is working very hard to get everything moving. I am sure a larger motor would use the same amount of fuel because it's not working as hard.
Spot on dougal, there is nothing wrong with building an engine to take the boost produced by the turbo so longevity shouldnt be a problem.
As far as the Transit vans go, Aust post ones go through brakes and trans like nothing on earth but it is mainly the way they are driven, as in the on off switch that is under the right foot.
One of the guys a trade schools Dad had the maintenance contract and he had plenty of turbo's failed from running them mega hot and then shutting them down, trans from driving flat out all the time and then jamming on the brakes and then thats why the brakes normally only lasted a couple of weeks before needing pads and discs as they would bring them in grinding.
He said they did a few diffs as well but they were a bit rarer.
As far as the new engine goes I havnt heard anything bad and you have to understand, there is no harsher useage than a courier vehical, stopping and starting all day, carting heavy loads and high speeds, jumping gutters and getting stuck in traffic in all temperatures and weather so the odd starter motor or ring gear wouldnt be surprising and electrical problems could be things to do with the coms equipment they have to have as well as they are made for the UK so you cant expect them to have a reliable electrical system, the poms wouldnt know what to do if their car started all the time.
All engines have their dramas and problems but as long as there is more good than bad then it cant be a bad thing to have more go for less fuel.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks