Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Ford may have put the last nail in the coffin for the defender.

  1. #11
    solmanic's Avatar
    solmanic is offline One Merc post away from being banned...
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maleny, Queensland
    Posts
    2,912
    Total Downloaded
    0
    2.4l 4 cylinders suits me fine.

    Less fuel consumption - which people ARE going to start caring about more and more, and only 4 x most of the complicated stuff to go wrong.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    5,901
    Total Downloaded
    0
    CUBIC INCHES

    Yeah - on paper the new engine appears to be lacking - but drive it before you pass judgment - it lacks nothing - it is the perfect engine for a Defender.
    2007 Defender 110
    2017 Mercedes Benz C Class. Cabriolet
    1993 BMW R100LT
    2024 Triumph Bonneville T120 Black

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    CUBIC INCHES
    - you always want more engine capacity for a bit of grunt pushing around your D130 and all your camping gear.
    Where do they think that 2.4 litres on 4 cylinders is going to get them when competing with the Japanese marques?
    They should do a Santana and put on an extra 2 cyl and make it 3.6 litres.

    Diana
    With a variable vane turbo, you've got all those extra cubic inches of air, they're just packed into a smaller space.
    Being variable vane, expect a lot of torque at not much rpm too.

    There is a replacement for displacement, it's called boost.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    ....There is a replacement for displacement, it's called boost.
    Dougal

    Boost has it's place and allowed diesel engines to meet some of the higher emission controls in Europe and North America, although in doing so it puts a little more stress on the engine, however when is 2.4 litres of boosted capacity the equal of the Nissan 4.2 litres of boosted capacity for example.

    What I don't really understand is why didn't they standardise the TDV6 across the whole range of LR products or at least offer it as a third option?

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What I don't really understand is why didn't they standardise the TDV6 across the whole range of LR products or at least offer it as a third option?
    I reckon that the TdV6 is a very expensive low volume premium engine vs the transit which is very large volume therefore cheap.
    In Uk nobody cares about highway performance and fuel is much more expensive than here.
    Another example of the Japanese caring about Australia(V8 diesel, large tanks ) and the Poms not caring at all.
    Regards Philip A

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    I reckon that the TdV6 is a very expensive low volume premium engine vs the transit which is very large volume therefore cheap.
    In Uk nobody cares about highway performance and fuel is much more expensive than here.
    Another example of the Japanese caring about Australia(V8 diesel, large tanks ) and the Poms not caring at all.
    Regards Philip A
    Phillip

    I would tend to agree with you, however adding the TDV6 as an option to the Defender range would require only minimal additional tooling and increase the volume of what you describe as a very expensive premium engine. It would be like the Series 3 Land Rover 2.3 petrol being sold at the same time as they were selling Series 3 Stage 1 V8's 2 versions of essentially the same Land Rover.

    I would be satisfied to buy a 2008 Defender 130 TDV6 at a premium price, after all experience is showing us that the Defenders are holding their value in the long term far better than the Discoveries.

    I guess it is a question we should ask the new owners next year.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    TOWNSVILLE
    Posts
    428
    Total Downloaded
    0

    New Motor

    I just purchased a Nissan Cab Chassis for work. Had a quote on the six litre diesel, but when purchasing could only get the new common rail 3.0L 4cyl. So I drove it and it goes fine. They are not a patch on the TdV6. Still they go fine and this one will cover most of Western QLD heavily loaded. My 300Tdi does not go quite as well but does go anywhere I wish and heavily loaded. I guess if I had a larger motor I would still be looking for more!! They are all Ok, in my opinion.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    TOWNSVILLE
    Posts
    428
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Omitted engine size

    I guess it does not matter as the 6cyl is not available now.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,575
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by solmanic View Post
    2.4l 4 cylinders suits me fine.

    Less fuel consumption - which people ARE going to start caring about more and more, and only 4 x most of the complicated stuff to go wrong.
    Less fuel consumption, not necessarily. I am quite happy with the performance of the Td5 most of the time, and off road the engine size really is about the least important factor.

    Towing is a different matter though. When I am loaded up with the camper trailer on the Td5 really is working very hard to get everything moving. I am sure a larger motor would use the same amount of fuel because it's not working as hard.

  10. #20
    mcrover Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    With a variable vane turbo, you've got all those extra cubic inches of air, they're just packed into a smaller space.
    Being variable vane, expect a lot of torque at not much rpm too.

    There is a replacement for displacement, it's called boost.
    Spot on dougal, there is nothing wrong with building an engine to take the boost produced by the turbo so longevity shouldnt be a problem.

    As far as the Transit vans go, Aust post ones go through brakes and trans like nothing on earth but it is mainly the way they are driven, as in the on off switch that is under the right foot.

    One of the guys a trade schools Dad had the maintenance contract and he had plenty of turbo's failed from running them mega hot and then shutting them down, trans from driving flat out all the time and then jamming on the brakes and then thats why the brakes normally only lasted a couple of weeks before needing pads and discs as they would bring them in grinding.

    He said they did a few diffs as well but they were a bit rarer.

    As far as the new engine goes I havnt heard anything bad and you have to understand, there is no harsher useage than a courier vehical, stopping and starting all day, carting heavy loads and high speeds, jumping gutters and getting stuck in traffic in all temperatures and weather so the odd starter motor or ring gear wouldnt be surprising and electrical problems could be things to do with the coms equipment they have to have as well as they are made for the UK so you cant expect them to have a reliable electrical system, the poms wouldnt know what to do if their car started all the time.

    All engines have their dramas and problems but as long as there is more good than bad then it cant be a bad thing to have more go for less fuel.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!