Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 87

Thread: Caster question caster was out -2.7

  1. #61
    tombraider Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ROVERNIT View Post
    but the bushes I can see them being a pain you press them in get a wheel alignment if it wrong punch them out press them in again get another wheel alignment mmmmmmm

    I think the arms more appealing
    NO, thats NOT how they work....

    You fit them AS PER INSTRUCTIONS which will result in a physical change of 3 degrees to the front alignment.

    You DONT take them out and change them each alignment.....

    Its a 30 minute job and its DONE....


  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    whoops wrong post.
    Maybe I went to sleep looking at this one.
    What is it about?
    You mean he didn't EXPECT to have neg caster when he lifted 4 inches?
    You mean he didn't read ANYTHING about the topic before doing it?

    If the axle is turned, I suggest he invests in a vastly expensive front propellor shaft with wide angle UJs, and maybe a scattershield if he retains the double cardan.
    Regards Philip A

    the problem is in listening.
    this has all been covered in NUMEROUS other threads and posts on several fourms.

    cheers phil

  3. #63
    tombraider Guest
    Rovernit, Unless this vehicle is to be a pure competition truck, driven solely on private property...

    You MUST keep it within the realms of safe and legal.

    Almost all trails are gazetted or on crown land, which requires a legal and registered vehicle to travel them.

    Now I dont quite explain how you are having so much trouble with this setup...

    Theres a few simple rules..... And you've ignored most of them....

    (off to have lunch, will post more after)



  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    lunch! crap, ive just got outta bed! yawn...

    spose ill have to roll breakfast and lunch into one

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discowhite View Post
    lunch! crap, ive just got outta bed! yawn...

    spose ill have to roll breakfast and lunch into one



    Same here!!!


    mmmmmmmm llluuunncchhhhhh


    JC

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Minchinbury NSW
    Posts
    1,032
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I didn't say it wasn't going to be engineered what's the point of engineering a vehicle not complete, the moment I get the caster arms bush sorted its the next step, so please stop harping me about engineering I've been there before with moded performance cars

    I didn't say I wasn't going to do it, there is really nothing out of the ordinary that cant be engineered, Slunnies was, and the only difference between his and mine is I have a cranked watts linkage and no one has proven to me there illegal yet and if so I'll remove it and eat humble pie and I bet his even sits higher then mine with his street tyres which are 34's I believe

    Christ sakes you all comment on the thing yet you have never seen it or driven it and sorry most of you speculate on how it drives as you have never driven a 4 inch lifted disco 2, I only run 32's will have it engineered with 34-35 if legal

    how many guys have cargo draws from what I've been told they need to be engineered too no one has them engineered I bet

    as said before there are heap of 3 inch lifted fenders and Disco running 34 35 that are higher then my disco how many of them are engineered probably zero how about the RR which was out yesterday again monstered over mine he had an axe on the bonnet now that's not legal, are they engineered I bet you there not, and even if they are engineered are they legal

    I have passed a many RBT hell I even tested the arc in a park on a bush rocks right next to cops and they didn't care luckily maybe they where having lunch

    Come on let it go, and give me break, are bush the go or arms I didn't go for bush as they have the stigma that the reduce arc if they don't it is a cheaper option isnt it
    Last edited by HAK; 30th December 2007 at 11:04 AM.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    On Simex's I sit 7" over standard combined and 6" over the D2's max spec ride height and it's fine considering its on Simex. On the 33" MTR's the thing handles really well and I would argue better than most with a 2" lift and 32's in the dirt. ACE is ACE! It's all engineered and it meets all of the ADR's, former NSW RTA guidelines as with the current DOTARS NCOP guidelines.

    Interesting about the Defenders though. Although they sit higher than a D2 I'm not sure what the difference in CofG is, as they have an alloy roof.



    Personally, I'd try the bushes first as they are cheap and then just see how they drive WRT vibration and steering response. If the Superpro ones flex, then awesome.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Close enough to their Shire to smell the dirty Hobbit feet
    Posts
    8,059
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tombraider View Post
    NO, thats NOT how they work....

    You fit them AS PER INSTRUCTIONS which will result in a physical change of 3 degrees to the front alignment.

    You DONT take them out and change them each alignment.....

    Its a 30 minute job and its DONE....

    Quote Originally Posted by tombraider View Post
    Rovernit, Unless this vehicle is to be a pure competition truck, driven solely on private property...

    You MUST keep it within the realms of safe and legal.

    Almost all trails are gazetted or on crown land, which requires a legal and registered vehicle to travel them.

    Now I dont quite explain how you are having so much trouble with this setup...

    Theres a few simple rules..... And you've ignored most of them....

    (off to have lunch, will post more after)



    Am I the only one that can read Tombraiders posts?

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Yeah, I wondered why Tombraiders lunch break has been 2.5hrs also! Where are you mate?

    Kidding, they're very valid points.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Minchinbury NSW
    Posts
    1,032
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    On Simex's I sit 7" over standard combined and 6" over the D2's max spec ride height and it's fine considering its on Simex. On the 33" MTR's the thing handles really well and I would argue better than most with a 2" lift and 32's in the dirt. ACE is ACE! It's all engineered and it meets all of the ADR's, former NSW RTA guidelines as with the current DOTARS NCOP guidelines.

    Interesting about the Defenders though. Although they sit higher than a D2 I'm not sure what the difference in CofG is, as they have an alloy roof.



    Personally, I'd try the bushes first as they are cheap and then just see how they drive WRT vibration and steering response. If the Superpro ones flex, then awesome.
    you would know better then any one when comes to the D2 lets pretend for moment that money isn't an issue would you go the arms from QT or the bush

    It has no increment of a vibrations, it drives straight, it doesn't wonder any more then it did standard hight which I believe its the tyres it is overly bouncy though

    if there is a small chance that the bush will cause variations then forget it I rather go the arms if there engine able

    with out all this nonsense do you think my truck will be engineered In your opinion?????

    now the thing has Springs, shocks, front lower shock mounts, spring retainers, wats linkage, and the x member spacer, I also have shims to correct the rear spring seat angle havent put that in yet though
    Last edited by HAK; 30th December 2007 at 11:33 AM.

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!