there is a 3.0 common rail version??? whats that in?
Printable View
Wider operating range and higher boost possible across the entire operating range. They also look after themselves better, no complicated control and vane position feedback required. Mechanically they are a lot more reliable and more efficient.
Many production diesel cars and trucks have dropped VNT for compound turbocharging.
It works by feeding your existing turbo some boost, which your existing turbo compounds into higher boost pressures. This creates more exhaust gas which drives both turbines harder. The result is a lot more boost sooner than you get with either turbo individually.
Ok so if I try to rearrange your words;
If our turbo is "out of its map" at 14psi boost and the T28 feeds the our turbo then because the supply air is higher than atmospheric pressure our turbo is back "in its map"?
Or using bogus numbers....
At 1600rpm our turbo makes 6psi.
If we use a T28 to feed it, at 1600rpm we might make 10psi.
It gets complex pretty quick. Turbo maps run on pressure ratios, multiples of the inlet pressure.
6psi from 14.5psi atmospheric is a PR of ~1.4.
If you feed the turbo 3psi (plus atmospheric) and it's still giving a PR of 1.4 then you've got ~10psi.
But. That 3 psi extra is also driving more exhaust flow so the small turbo can do a little better again.
Or possibly 15.
I went through trying to reverse engineer the 300tdi original turbo and I got ~5.5psi at 1500rpm.
By increasing the fuel I think ~7psi is all you're going to get.
Compounded with a T28 I got ~14.7psi and not many more rpm to hit ~20psi. This combination has no problem doing 30psi, but that would be silly.
I got the same ~14.7psi compounded with my mystery turbo, but the higher rpm is much better with much reduced exhaust manifold pressures.
Like 👍