Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: V8 Intake -Is this too restrictive/too hot?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0

    V8 Intake -Is this too restrictive/too hot?

    Have been thinking a bit about installing a cold air intake on my V8 intake system (non standard).
    The current inlet to the Donaldson air cleaner is sucking in engine bay air which would have to be much hotter than ambient. There are also at least 5 90 degree (or worse) bends the air has to travel to get to each carb. Are these bends significant in terms of power losses?
    If I install a cold air intake, it will mean at least another two 90 degree bends and extra tubing. Would the benefits outweight the extra pipe friction? Or is it not worth bothering with anyway? Hopefully the below pictures illustrate the situation.





    Last edited by mark2; 11th February 2013 at 10:23 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oatley, NSW
    Posts
    974
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I thought the exact same thing you did with my original carbie setup. And I was determined to minimise the distance the air would have to travel through. So I changed it to LPG and configured it like so:



    I had it passing through the bonnet with a filter on it... The gains weren't anything impressive. So I have now configured it like so to allow me to put the filter back inside the engine bay:



    So in short... No matter what you do, while it will technically be an improvement, you won't notice a difference. The only time I noticed a difference was when I went to the EFI manifold. There was a notable increase of low down torque due to the longer runners in the manifold.

    As for the air temperature present where the filter is located, yes it would be hotter when the car is sitting in traffic or something of the sort, but it will be close to atmospheric temperature when you are driving at 100km/h.
    Last edited by stirlsilver; 2nd March 2008 at 09:45 PM.
    Stirling

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Stirling,

    Were you running lpg when you had the carbs on it? Am wondering if you noticed an improvement when you went to LPG only and got rid of the carbs?
    I presume you're also lpg only with the efi manifold? I'm not sure if I want to lose the ability to run petrol as a backup........

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oatley, NSW
    Posts
    974
    Total Downloaded
    0
    When I was on the carbies, I was running petrol only. I decided to do a LPG only setup as it let me increase the CR to 12:1. Most of the time you notice a power loss when going from petrol to LPG, hard to say if there was an increase of power. The place that did the LPG installation did a dyno tune and it got 120Hp with 300lb/ft at the rear wheels. I would be more inclined to say that it stayed the same.

    Yes, i am running LPG on the efi manifold. I got the injector ports welded up and just fitted the mixer ring up stream of the throttle body. I'm pretty sure the mixer ring I am currently using is causing a lot of power loss due to the size of the orifice. I designed a new one, but I haven't fitted it yet.

    I don't regret doing a LPG only setup. I have a 180L gas tank and I can do close to 1000K's off it. And if I do run into problems I have a hose which allows me to run the engine off BBQ gas bottles.
    Stirling

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oatley, NSW
    Posts
    974
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If anyone is curious. This is the mixer ring I designed. Will be interesting to see how it goes when I fit it. It SHOULD be better... but you never know.



    Stirling

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It certainly looks good .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stirlsilver View Post
    If anyone is curious. This is the mixer ring I designed. Will be interesting to see how it goes when I fit it. It SHOULD be better... but you never know.



    Is the idea of the ramped edges to provide less obstruction to air flow than the typical squared off edge to the mixer ring?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oatley, NSW
    Posts
    974
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yup, exactly.
    Stirling

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Would there be any benefit to making the outlet taper less at the expense of a steeper inlet taper?
    It'd give you less turbulence, but I guess you need a certain amount of turbulence for mixing anyway.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oatley, NSW
    Posts
    974
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah the mixing is the only thing I am currently worried about... Because the current ring I am using depends on turbulence to do the mixing (dirty way in my opinion) so I may face some problems as a result of that.

    You are right about the slope, ideally you wouldn't want any hard edges but that is too hard to machine. The only reason I have this slope angle is because the mixer was getting VERY long! As it is i'm going to have trouble fitting it in my engine bay!

    I think i'm thread hijacking... sorry mark
    Stirling

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!