Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: LT vs Radial

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    465
    Total Downloaded
    0

    LT vs Radial

    Had an interesting conversation with a local tyre dealer yesterday. It went something like this....

    Me: "I'm interested in some off-road tyres. Can you tell me the differences between LT and radial and which would be better?"

    Him: "No diff mate! They are both round and do the same job"


    I understand the basic principles (ie: ply and load rating)

    So, what are the differences and what is better for off-road in real world terms.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,078
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As far as I know they are both likely to be radials but the LT (light Truck) tyres will have stronger side walls and a higher load rating, but having said that my BFG Mud Terrains have LT in the designation.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by djames View Post
    Had an interesting conversation with a local tyre dealer yesterday. It went something like this....

    Me: "I'm interested in some off-road tyres. Can you tell me the differences between LT and radial and which would be better?"

    Him: "No diff mate! They are both round and do the same job"


    I understand the basic principles (ie: ply and load rating)

    So, what are the differences and what is better for off-road in real world terms.
    Most offroad tyres are radials, the older conventional or rag tyres aren't fitted as standard these days.

    Radials are a compromise for offroad use and onroad handling, they are more prone to stake type punctures, whereas conventional tyres are not and have a stronger resistance to stake type punctures.

    MRF are a good quality conventional tyre for offroad use, but the onroad handling won't be as good as a radial type tyre.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    You can get LT (Light Truck) in both radial ply and bias ply tyres PSimpson is on the mark when he suggests the side walls of the LT are stronger than the passenger car type tyres. When you get into sizes that don't fit on cars they don't bother with the LT designation.

    The main difference between radial ply tyres and bias ply tyres is the speed rating. Bias ply tyres are usually rated to only 80 or 90 KPH, where radials will go up to 200 KPH and more with some brands and sizes.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Check out this link
    Beadell Tours - Tyre Information

    Cheers
    Simon

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    The main difference between radial ply tyres and bias ply tyres is the speed rating. Bias ply tyres are usually rated to only 80 or 90 KPH, where radials will go up to 200 KPH and more with some brands and sizes.

    Diana
    There is a significant carcass design difference between the two which is really defining.

    Also a lot of the Bias tyres have got some pretty good speed ratings also. The Simex are genrally N-Q rated which is 140-160km/h.

    But, and LT tyre is usually a heavy duty radial tyre.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The entire carcass of an LT construction tyre is heavier duty than a P rated tyre.

    Usually, P tyres only use 2-4 tread plies, LT tyres use 6,8,10, etc., depending on the load rating.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    <snip>

    The main difference between radial ply tyres and bias ply tyres is the speed rating. Bias ply tyres are usually rated to only 80 or 90 KPH, where radials will go up to 200 KPH and more with some brands and sizes.

    Diana
    oh oh, I used to race on bias belted tyres and we used to do a tad more than 90km/h..................








    (a lot of race tyres are still bias belt construction )

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The front tyres we raced on at Donald were "tractor" tyres,, 16x5",, REALLY high profile,,
    no more than 6" of tyre on the road,,


    and at 210kph they raised up, in the centre, quite a bit!!


    but the reason/trade off is a high strong sidewall.

    please dont ask me what the speed rating is,,,,
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    oh oh, I used to race on bias belted tyres and we used to do a tad more than 90km/h..................


    (a lot of race tyres are still bias belt construction )
    That may have been, but when you were racing they probably didn't have a speed rating on the tyre. I also don't know enough about bias "belted" tyres to be able to argue that issue.

    Whether Mr Plod would even look at the rating on the tyres, or in-fact know what the respective speed rating applied by a tyre manufacturer means is anyone's guess. However, these days it seems that tyre manufacturers won't rate bias ply tyres above 90KPH irrespective of whether they are capable of the speeds we used to do on them. I bet it all comes down to the insurance companies and what they will cover.

    One thing that isn't mentioned is that the set-up of the suspension and steering is based on the tyres it is running. For example the Series Land Rovers are set up for bias ply tyres while the Range Rover was set up for radial ply, belted or not.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!