Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 66

Thread: spring retainers vs dislocation cones

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    sunny Hobart
    Posts
    1,293
    Total Downloaded
    0

    spring retainers vs dislocation cones

    hi all,

    quick question... are dislocation cones better than spring retainers ?

    when a coil spring is under no weight from the car ie. fully extended and the wheel is still off the ground, will the weight of the wheel and axle housing (for the rear) pull the coil spring down (over extend it) so the wheel touches the ground and gives some traction?

    I am thinking of buying some extra long shocks for the back of my D1 and they will have more travel than the 2 inch longer coils so I will have to consider using the spring retainers or fitting dislocation cones on the back..

    all in the quest for extra articulation (downwards travel )

    any advice appreciated

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IME (and IMHO) retained is preferable, as it will give you more predictable handling, without the lurching and clunking when springs dis- and re- locate.

    Dislocating setups may look cool on a ramp, but don't give you much more in usable travel IMHO.

  3. #3
    TonyC is offline Wizard Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NE Victoria
    Posts
    1,414
    Total Downloaded
    32.83 MB
    Put longer softer springs in to get the same ride height and more down travel, otherwise the cost and effort of the longer shocks is a waste.

    Tony

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    gold coast,tweed heads
    Posts
    495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes the springs will stretch when retained,more so in a cross axle situation
    than say the vehicle supported on a two post hoist.Eric.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    sunny Hobart
    Posts
    1,293
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
    Put longer softer springs in to get the same ride height and more down travel
    I considered softer springs as well but I tow a trailer and like the ride characteristics of the current springs when loaded and cornering at speed (no death defying lean)

    thanks

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Retaining the rear will also force the front suspension to work.

    I did a test on my old coiled rear and SUA'd front 100" Landy IIa ute. With the rear unretained I could lift a rear wheel only about 20cm before a spring dislocated and the front did absolutely nothing. Sadly I didn't take pics.

    This is what it did after I strapped the rear to retain it.

    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IME (and IMHO) dislocated works just as well!
    for my setup i couldnt get the height and rate for the rear coils i wanted with out coil bind to go retained, so i went for the ''****'' factor that seams to work really well in my rig, but not that i know anything i do all my wheeling on the web

    cheers phil

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by discowhite View Post
    IME (and IMHO) dislocated works just as well!
    for my setup i couldnt get the height and rate for the rear coils i wanted with out coil bind to go retained, so i went for the ''****'' factor that seams to work really well in my rig, but not that i know anything i do all my wheeling on the web

    cheers phil
    I think also that weight and suspension balance (increasing bind) will have a lot to do with it. On my IIa, being unretained did not work in the slightest, but there was a significant weight imbalance between the front and the rear. You jigger may work well unretained because the weight distribution is better than what I had.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,937
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had dislocating springs on the last Rangie but will go retained on "Dancing Hippo". I never had a problem with traction when dislocating but there are 2 problems:
    1. They are very noisy with lots of "clanging"
    2. They can easily and very quickly upset the balance of the car when you are on very hairy angles.

  10. #10
    lokka Guest
    On a 100in chasis even the 110in they both work well with the rear unretained at the top im in the process of desiging a relocation set up that dosent go in side the coils so i can fit air bags for towing and run a softer rate coil for beta off roading

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!