
Originally Posted by
Bush65
I thought it should b easy to make.
309 has a higher service temp (980 C) than 304, 316 and 321 (870 C).
The low carbon grades are not as strong as the same grade with high carbon 304L vs 304, etc.
Carbide precipitation at the grain boundaries at elevated temps is a problem, so 312 stabalised with titanium or low carbon grades are used.
Another problem is formation of Sigma Phase at high temps, which makes the material brittle. 304 grade is immune but grades with high chrome (309) or with molybdenum (316) have problems.
Edit: Sigma phase formation occurs at temps between 590 and 870 C, a range where exhaust manifolds for turbo diesels operate.
IMHO 321 is a better choice, but 304L would be ok.
Edit: I mentioned duplex stainless in an earlier post. Duplex stainless is good where stress corrosion cracking is a problem with chloride containing environments, but the temps were are talking of are too high for these grades.
Bookmarks