Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Isuzu into D1/RRC

  1. #31
    lokka Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Bush65 View Post
    IMHO, the best grade of staino to use would be 321 - ASTM A213-TP321 seamless tube or A249-TP321 welded tube. But 304 or 304L (low carbon) would be ok - ASTM A213-TP304 seamless tube or A249-TP304 welded tube (add an L for low carbon).

    Duplex staino (SAF) would have the advantage of lower thermal expansion.

    Here is a pic that shows a fabricated 4 into 1 manifold that should perform a bit better than the 1-2 3-4 manifold and simpler to make than other 4 into 1's that I have seen. This is not for an Isuzu, just shows the configuration.
    John that manifold looks good and wouldent be hard to make either ..
    As for staino grades i thought 316L or 309L would be the go as thats what i use to use mainly for the exhaust components on underground stuff ...

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lokka View Post
    John that manifold looks good and wouldent be hard to make either ..
    As for staino grades i thought 316L or 309L would be the go as thats what i use to use mainly for the exhaust components on underground stuff ...
    I thought it should b easy to make.

    309 has a higher service temp (980 C) than 304, 316 and 321 (870 C).

    The low carbon grades are not as strong as the same grade with high carbon 304L vs 304, etc.

    Carbide precipitation at the grain boundaries at elevated temps is a problem, so 312 stabalised with titanium or low carbon grades are used.

    Another problem is formation of Sigma Phase at high temps, which makes the material brittle. 304 grade is immune but grades with high chrome (309) or with molybdenum (316) have problems.

    Edit: Sigma phase formation occurs at temps between 590 and 870 C, a range where exhaust manifolds for turbo diesels operate.

    IMHO 321 is a better choice, but 304L would be ok.

    Edit: I mentioned duplex stainless in an earlier post. Duplex stainless is good where stress corrosion cracking is a problem with chloride containing environments, but the temps were are talking of are too high for these grades.
    Last edited by Bush65; 2nd September 2007 at 03:52 PM.

  3. #33
    lokka Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Bush65 View Post
    I thought it should b easy to make.

    309 has a higher service temp (980 C) than 304, 316 and 321 (870 C).

    The low carbon grades are not as strong as the same grade with high carbon 304L vs 304, etc.

    Carbide precipitation at the grain boundaries at elevated temps is a problem, so 312 stabalised with titanium or low carbon grades are used.

    Another problem is formation of Sigma Phase at high temps, which makes the material brittle. 304 grade is immune but grades with high chrome (309) or with molybdenum (316) have problems.

    Edit: Sigma phase formation occurs at temps between 590 and 870 C, a range where exhaust manifolds for turbo diesels operate.

    IMHO 321 is a better choice, but 304L would be ok.

    Edit: I mentioned duplex stainless in an earlier post. Duplex stainless is good where stress corrosion cracking is a problem with chloride containing environments, but the temps were are talking of are too high for these grades.
    Yep duplex or saf as its known to those in the game is the go but has a preaty good price tag

    Tho 309 isnt much cheaper at the moment staino in all grades is up in price as there s a problem in the market and has been for a while ...

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lokka View Post
    Yep duplex or saf as its known to those in the game is the go but has a preaty good price tag

    Tho 309 isnt much cheaper at the moment staino in all grades is up in price as there s a problem in the market and has been for a while ...
    Sandvik designate their duplex staino grades as SAF xxxx. They produce equivalent grades to ASTM specifications for duplex staino such as S31803 and S32304 etc. used in the pressure vessel and piping codes.

    My comment in the previous post was to correct a recommendation in a previous post. IMHO, SAF would not be suitable for the temperatures of a turbo diesel exhaust manifold.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    narellan, sydney
    Posts
    1,131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bush65 View Post
    Carbide precipitation at the grain boundaries at elevated temps is a problem, so 312 stabalised with titanium or low carbon grades are used.

    Another problem is formation of Sigma Phase at high temps, which makes the material brittle. 304 grade is immune but grades with high chrome (309) or with molybdenum (316) have problems.

    Edit: Sigma phase formation occurs at temps between 590 and 870 C, a range where exhaust manifolds for turbo diesels operate.

    Edit: I mentioned duplex stainless in an earlier post. Duplex stainless is good where stress corrosion cracking is a problem with chloride containing environments, but the temps were are talking of are too high for these grades.
    John, your posts are too complex for me. If i ever ask you a question, please answer with "yes", "No" or a picture. everything else goes over my head with your posts.

    Example 1 : Are you planning LPG for the 200hp animal? (yes or no)

    Andy
    ps any pics of the bushy?

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!