4L60E to LT230 adapter would be much more useful:)
Printable View
4L60E to LT230 adapter would be much more useful:)
I would disagree. The power issue alone would mean that most would be replacing zf's left right and centre, and the $8g price tag to build one up would make going a 4L80e a much more attractive solution, that and adaptors already exist for that transmission.Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilipA
If on the other hand you could build up the ZF for half of what it costs now...:cool:
Im with Vern
"4L60E to LT230 adapter would be much more useful" except that the 4L60 or T700 is the one you want (Commy VN V8) .
Tebone has done the adaption , but like all others that have tried , solving the front shaft clearance issue still looks like the major issue . otherwise , import a LS2 (far superior to a LS1 Gen 3)with a 4L80E out of of a Silverado/Suburban/GMC ,
thanks for the advice but i have a 5 speed manual iam knot very good with autos
You may have missed the point ! No 5 speed rover box will come even close to Handling that sort of power .! even the R380 is still only a 77mm box , no different to a LT77 . the LT85 santana is a bit stronger , the LT95 old 4 speed stronger again but its only a 4 speed with archaic selectors/synchros and its own Transfercase.
Never seen a LT95 box cutdown to have a LT230 transfercase fitted , that would be interesting !!!
what he ^ said, goodluck with the 5 speed thingy:eek:
Andrew is getting adaptor machined up, second prototype is being fitted to his own race car, hopefully he'll get the ball rolling, then I'll be offering fit ups:)
Why go with the hydraulic box? 4L60e is a better (not good:angel:) trany to start with and fully controlled with the Delphi ecuQuote:
Originally Posted by 400HPONGAS
Fit ups hey.:D:DQuote:
Originally Posted by rovercare
First you gotta get that heap of junk your doing now out of the shed:angel:Quote:
Originally Posted by rovercare