Exactly that. All 'Ramp Queen' vehicles I have seen are undriveable and dangerous at speed. The Landie is just an allround perfect fit.
JC
Printable View
Exactly that. All 'Ramp Queen' vehicles I have seen are undriveable and dangerous at speed. The Landie is just an allround perfect fit.
JC
here is my ramp queen https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...013/02/689.jpg I could have driven to the top without too much trouble,but was asked in the interests of safety to remain where I was,as I had already won:D
And it can still do this sort of thing and more,off road;)https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...013/02/690.jpg
But I do admit that my Tdi doesn't go fast enough to worry about high speed handling:D
So do things properly and you can have your Jeep and eat it too;)
Wayne, OT but whats the snorkle head in the pic on the ramp ??
thanks ..Don
I agree balance between front and back is the goal, but hard (next to impossible) to achieve with radius arms and stock suspension mounts.
have a look at these guys - they appear to be well thought out
www.x-eng.co.uk
cheers Blyhte
Simon does think these things out well.
Unfortunately making the rear articulate better doesn't address the articulation balance between front and rear - the rear articulation comes at the expense of front articulation (i.e. the chassis and body stay/roll with the front axle).
I don't want a ramp queen. I want to be able to follow you into, and out of the woods. The truck is already without swaybars, has OME 751 Front & 755 rear springs, nitrocharger shocks, and 235/85/16. I don't want too much lift. I don't want to look badass cruising around Sydney.
So, the Superior arms look cool. Great, will keep an eye out for what happens and who uses them when they come out. I am unlikely to be an early adopter.
Jeep was well balanced... I could roll through medium difficultly rock gardens and the vehicle was level. I won't be going as nuts with the landy. Since I don't know them well, I don't know which manufacturers are crap, which modifications are a waste, etc. Would like to know where the right balance is, and I would like to do it right, the first time around. :)
As John said, it's hard to balance the front and rear roll rates as the radius arms increase roll stiffness as they articulate (through bush distortion)
A fix for a while was some bushes made by a company in Queensland that allowed the bushes to displace the distorted rubber more easily, but AFAIA Haultech no longer make them and I doubt if they still have stock.
I used them and they worked well, but they also wore out more quickly than stock ones too, just the nature of the design.
A number of us use longer front dampers, usually TLC 80 Series Koni's or OME's and raise the towers to get more droop without limiting bump travel but a little over 10"-11" of stroke seems about the maximum amount of travel you'll get out of a relatively standard front end.
Don
The Raised Air Intake head in that picture is a Sy-Klone,it is the current head that I run on the old truck.And I must say that I am very impressed.I used to go through an air filter every 2-3 trips into the dust hills around here,and I found this to be quite expensive after a while.I was doing a bit of investigating about finding an alternative to the "ramhead" which just let in dust and leaves and sticks and half trees :DThen I read a report by "Nugget" on here,and his thought on the Sy-Klone that he fitted to his Puma.So I did a lot more investigating and spoke to them direct.After working out which head I required by the airflow required,I ordered it and it arrived in 2 days from QLD and I haven't had to replace a filter again,since I fitted a genuine filter at the same time as the head.At over $30 each,it doesn't take long to recoup the cost of the head.I have been more than impressed.It may not look fancy like a nice big "RamHead" but like the rest of the truck,I will take function over looks ,any time.