Originally Posted by
Bush65
That is the way I read the NCOP, but not how I read the QLD regs over riding parts of the NCOP.
I will have to check when I have more time, but from memory it is very clear that the 50mm increase applies to the original track, and it is out of the engineers hands to increase it further.
This is an issue for me. I'm resigned to not getting my bushie registered in QLD because of this - a lot of $$$$ in the portal axles.
When I moved to QLD, I bought with me stronger axles based on 105 series Landcruiser, with air lockers and longfield cv's, etc. These were in the bushie before I changed it to portals. I wanted to put these under my 120, and knew QLD was intending to adopt the NCOP. I didn't anticipate they would over rule that part of the NCOP.
So now I still trying to work out what to do to put stronger axles under my 120. Because of other issues, I need a strong rear end to replace the salisbury, which I can't easily use in my case (I don't particularly like it anyway). I could shorten my 105 axle but then I have to depend upon custom half shafts that can't be replaced with stock shafts that can be found almost anywhere. The other option is to get some custom wheels made with much more offset to reduce the track, but that will make my front freewheel hubs very exposed to rocks, and worsen the loads on the steering (scrub radius) and wheel bearings.
If you are right, it will make a great deal of difference to me, but I fear you are too optimistic. I look forward to being corrected.