Thread: One for the bee keepers

UP THE MIGHTY BEES!.


China tempted by New South Wales north coast honey - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Urban bee keepers fight to maintain healthy bee populations - ABC Rural (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

A key to identifying gum trees


[ame]https://www.moretonbay.qld.gov.au/uploadedFiles/common/forms/environment/Gumtree-Identification-Booklet.pdf[/ame]

GO the native bees!


Substance from Australian bees could be used to relieve arthritis and heal wounds faster - ABC Rural (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Our honey is unique


News-

A recap on varroa

https://theconversation.com/explaine...ias-bees-25710

Another hurrah for native bees/

Blooming macadamias bring hope for another bumper harvest - ABC Rural (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

There's Always Something New To Learn by Ross Conrad (this is a US article relating to screened bottom boards)


Screened Bottom Boards: There's Always Something New To Learn | Bee Culture
Despite having worked six years for a commercial beekeeping outfit with
over a thousand hives, and having kept bees for over twenty years, I am
still constantly learning and seeing new things related to bees and
beekeeping. For instance, this summer for the first time ever, I saw a hive
of bees building comb under the bottom board of their hive. I took photos
of the hive since I had never seen a colony do such a thing before. I thought
it was just a fluky thing, but lo-and-behold, later in the Summer I saw
another hive doing the same thing. So what's going on here?
In both cases, the hives in question were outfitted with a screened bottom
board. The screened bottom board was first utilized widely by researchers
who wanted to test various treatments for Varroa mites. It is tricky
business trying to develop a pesticide that will kill a mite living on a bee,
without also killing the bee.

The researchers reasoned that by replacing
the solid wooden bottom board with a screened bottom board, mites that
die and fall to the bottom of the hive as a result of the treatment will fall
through the screen. Researchers could then collect the dead mites, count them and determine the efficacy of the treatments they
were testing. When conducting such trials properly of course, control hives have to be outfitted with screened bottom boards as
well, but the controls are not given the mite treatments. It was during such trials that researchers observing control hives during
trials discovered that a significant percentage of mites in a hive simply lose their grip and fall to the bottom of the hive during the
course of the year whether the hive is treated for Varroa or not. As a result, many beekeepers now use screened bottom boards on
their hives. It is the least labor intensive, and low cost method of removing a relatively small percentage of mites from a hive
(approx. 20%) year-round without adding to the colony the additional stress that can be caused by the chemical contamination
most Varroa treatments leave behind. While a screened bottom board is not enough on its own to keep bees infested with Varroa
alive for very long, it can be part of a successful mite mitigation approach (see Bee Culture June 2015, Bermuda Bees or Bust).


Since the use of screened bottom boards in hives became commonplace, beekeepers have discovered that screened bottom boards
can provide improved hive ventilation, helping to keep the hive cooler in the Summer, and aiding in the prevention of moisture
building up in the hive during Winter.
Screened bottoms that are left open to the ground also eliminate the need to clean out the bits of pollen, beeswax and propolis,
which along with the occasional mite and other hive debris can build up over time underneath the screen. When this happens it can
attract scavengers such as wax moths and small hive beetles unless it is cleaned out regularly by the beekeeper.


In the case of the two hives observed this past season, they both were outfitted with screened bottom boards that were open to the
ground, and they both were elevated above the ground high enough to provide room for the bees to build and maintain comb
underneath the screen. Another commonality was that both hives were strong, healthy hives that were allowed to experience very
overcrowded conditions. In the first case the hive belonged to the widow of a beekeeper who recently passed into spirit and despite
her best intentions, the hive was not being checked on a very regular basis. In the second case, I split a hive into a five-frame nucleus
colony and inadvertently transferred the old queen into the nuc. When I checked the nucleus colony 30 days later, it had completely
filled up the three additional frames of drawn comb and two frames of foundation that I had used to fill out the rest of the space in
the 10-frame hive body that housed the five-frame nuc, and the colony had built burr comb all over the underside of the inner cover
and filled the burr comb with honey. To make matters worse, I had run out of supers of drawn comb so I had to place a super of
foundation on top of this overcrowded hive. This occurred right around the time the rains stopped coming regularly in Vermont's
Champlain Valley, causing the honey flow to slow to a trickle. As a result, the colony never drew out the foundation, and so even
though the hive had room to expand, the foundation was not ?usable? space for storing honey, pollen or raising brood, and this
exasperated the overcrowded conditions.

The first question that came to mind when I discovered each of these hives was: is this a swarm with a second queen or an extension
of the colony above? And if it is an extension of the hive above, do the combs below the bottom board contain brood? A close
inspection revealed that in both cases, the combs were filled with honey and bee bread, with only the occasional single developing
cell of drone brood. These isolated brood cells were apparently laid by a worker bee whose ovaries became active due to lack of
exposure to the queen and brood pheromones above the screen. This indicated that in both cases, the combs below the bottom
board were an extension of the colony above. It was a relief to find no significant amounts of brood below the screens which meant
that the queens were staying put inside their respective hives where they belonged. Here in the northeast U.S., bees that are not
enclosed within a protective cavity and are exposed to the biting wind, blowing snow, sleet, rain, hail and whatever else winter
decides to dish up, do not stand a chance of surviving. Thus, I had to remove the comb under the bottom board and get the bees back
into the hive above. I first tried replacing the bottom board, and moving the original bottom board, complete with comb, bees, honey
and pollen some distance away from the hive. I figured the bees would find their way back to the hive, and rob out the honey in the
combs left on the original bottom board bringing it back to the hive with them. Unfortunately, it was not as simple as that, for when
the bees returned to the hive, they chose to go underneath the new bottom board that had been installed and started building comb
under there again. Well I figured, why fight them? If the bees want to be under the bottom board, I would try to work with their
natural tendency rather than against it.

This time I placed an empty shallow super of drawn comb under the replacement bottom
board so that the bees had someplace to go when they returned to their favorite spot underneath the hive. In late Fall when the cool
weather returns, I plan on removing the shallow super from under the bottom board. If the super is full of honey I can either harvest
it or use it as Winter feed for the hive, and if it has significant amount of honey and pollen stored in the combs but also has
significant amounts of empty comb, I plan on placing it above the screened bottom board but leave it on the bottom of the hive. This
way the rest of the hive will have easy access to the honey and pollen in the combs and can move the food around the hive as needed
when temperatures are favorable to do so.
Before the advent of the screened bottom board, the scenario as described above would never have occurred. However, as is the
case whenever a new technology or method is introduced, unexpected consequences can result ? just another educational
experience in my ongoing adventures with the bees.
Ross Conrad is the author of Natural Beekeeping: Organic Approaches to Modern Apiculture