Tombie I think it's more an issue of the fuel companies having to reach emissions targets - this is the reason sulphur content has reduced drastically in modern diesel fuel - sulphur is useful when combined with a few other light metals in lubricating the components of the fuel system, especially the HPFP.
Apparently certain techniques for reducing sulphur also strip the lubricity from diesel fuel. It would seem reasonable that using a substitute lubricant like 2T would reduce the possibility of fuel pump failure due to poor lubrication.
At the end of the day the fuel companies are out to make $$$ and there would have to be a raft of certifications that their product would have to undergo in order to prove that using 2T in their fuel would be advantageous and not in any way damaging to the environment. I doubt they would bother unless pressed to by external factors (competition, etc).



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks