Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Mog or 101

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast Queensland Australia
    Posts
    6,469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    you blokes are dreaming.
    a falcon or dunnydore will do most draggin' a caravan.
    so why bother with either.
    certainly the merc will be the greater achiever, but only the military can afford to run them
    Safe Travels
    harry

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There was a off road requirement in the question ,and different strokes for different blokes.

  3. #13
    OZ101 Guest
    The problem with the Jap 4x4 e.g. Canter etc no diff locks (I think the Canter has a rear diff lock but not sure) and difficult to get after-market off road gear for them, they are not designed for hard off roading like the 101 & Mog, but on road you can't beat them.
    So I suppose it depends on what type of traveling you want to do.

    What about the MAN 13.280 Its got the lot diff lock all round ABS EBS Triptronic gear box, cruise control,climate control the list goes on and on, might be a bit to big for the smaller tracks through, does anyone know what these trucks are like when the going gets tough?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I like THESE beasts

    I believe that they are used up north in Qld and the operators are very happy with them

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by OZ101 View Post
    The problem with the Jap 4x4 e.g. Canter etc no diff locks (I think the Canter has a rear diff lock but not sure) and difficult to get after-market off road gear for them, they are not designed for hard off roading like the 101 & Mog, but on road you can't beat them.
    So I suppose it depends on what type of traveling you want to do.

    What about the MAN 13.280 Its got the lot diff lock all round ABS EBS Triptronic gear box, cruise control,climate control the list goes on and on, might be a bit to big for the smaller tracks through, does anyone know what these trucks are like when the going gets tough?
    In THIS site you will find plenty info about making the Canter a capable vehicle

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,127
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoDavo View Post
    Slunnie, $5k for mog axles ?

    Anyone got an idea as to the cost for Pinz axles ?
    Marks are about to release a GQ portal kit for $15K!! Pinz gotta be close to LR for track?!

    And to get back on thread, just what the doctor ordered:
    Unimog Australia: U1750L/38 camper
    Cheers, Dave.
    Hmmm, I was certain thats what Rob @ TractiveForce was bringing in refurb by Mercedes mog axles for - in crates. Just jumped onto their website and they dont have a sales section in it anymore unless Ive got the wrong website!

    Nup, just checked. the website is correct but the sales section is gone.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by OZ101 View Post
    The problem with the Jap 4x4 difficult to get after-market off road gear for them,
    You will not buy model specific after-market off road gear for a 101 either - and I would assume the same would apply to a mog.

    As Ron said - the 101 and Mog were designed for specific purposes and long distance touring is not one of them. There are better vehicles available.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Greater Sydney Area
    Posts
    284
    Total Downloaded
    0

    What about the OKA ?

    Having driven Unimogs extensively while in the Army, and my own 101 Ambulance extensively as a private vehicle, if given a choice I would try the OKA.

    Anyone have personal experience with these ?

    Cheers

    Phill

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    4,656
    Total Downloaded
    0
    OKAs are hugely expensive aren't they?

    I probably spent more time driving Iain Reed's 101 at Corowa than my own truck (!) and while I love it, I don't know that I would want to do a lot of long distance work in it.

    I haven't driven a Mog - It's on my list of things to do...
    [B][I]Andrew[/I][/B]

    [COLOR="YellowGreen"][U]1958 Series II SWB - "Gus"[/U][/COLOR]
    [COLOR="DarkGreen"][U]1965 Series IIA Ambulance 113-896 - "Ambrose"[/U][/COLOR]
    [COLOR="#DAA520"][U]1981 Mercedes 300D[/U][/COLOR]
    [U]1995 Defender 110[/U]
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A friend of mine purchased a OKA.
    It has a dual cab and a body on the back set up for long distance touring.
    It has every option that was available when purchased.
    The cabin is very large and workable.
    The power is a turbo 4 litre perkins.
    the running gear is rockwell and the front diff is Dana 60 and the rear a Dana 70.
    Construction thoughout is very heavy duty as the OKA was designed with the mining industry in mine. (rops cab).
    The OKA makes a fine chassis for a explore Aussie camper.
    It is also very heavy and expensive.
    It spreads the weight on four tyres only.
    Jap 4x4 trucks tend to have duals on the back and are cheaper with less weight.
    It comes back to personal requirements and tastes.
    We are not comparing apples with apples, but oranges with apples.
    The 101 is a small vehicle and designed light for air transport with a one tonne payload as manufactured.(1500 kg weight stripped).
    The mog is a much larger vehicle and in a different class again.
    Both mog and 101 are designed for military convoy speeds and needs.
    The small jap trucks (4x4) are 4 tonne payload and usually duals on the rear with a self locking diff and much, much better cabins with engines and drive trains designed for modern road systems.
    The OKA is different again and more strongly built than the jap trucks as they are designed for the hard yards of industry. ( when was the last time you have seen body components made from 3/8 steel plate ?)
    In Contrast the 101 is mostly Birmabright pop riveted together and alloy motor and running gear and why the 101 is a great military vehicle and a poor industry work horse.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!