
Originally Posted by
Brian Hjelm
There was legal action in the early 1970's taken by a group of Jeep buyers against Annand and Thompson. They had bought old stock Jeeps, some three years old, as "new" cars and were seeking compensation for loss of value as their purchases say in 1969 of 1966 manufacture Jeeps were regarded by the trade as 1966 models, not 1969 when purchased as "new". The court was asked to determine what was a "new" car and had the buyers suffered a loss by buying "old" cars without being informed by Annand & Thompson of the true year model, and was there deliberate deception by A & T.
What came out, and anyone in the trade could have told them, was that the new vehicle trade regarded vehicles as new if not previously sold at retail, or registered for use as a demonstrator or company car. The used vehicle trade of course, identifies by year model. No compliance plates then.
I don't recall the outcome.
You beat me to the punch on this one - as I remember the complainants won. What brought it to light was that these "new" jeeps started to develop severe rust problems after they had been sold. They had been stored outside in the weather for the 3 -4 years prior to being sold.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Bookmarks