Removing Rear 90 Puma seats

**isuzurover** · 4th March 2011, 02:08 PM

Originally Posted by KarlB

The requirement re seating capacity relates to the number of seatbelts fitted, not the number of 'cushions' etc. so I left the seat belts. I admit it is a grey area however, but made my decision in full knowledge of that.

Sorry Karl, but you are incorrect.

Have a read of the NCOP (already adopted in ACT). It lists strict requirements for the "cushions"
http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/roa...Jan2011_v2.pdf

You are permitted to remove seats temporarily (i.e. to transport bulky items), however if it has been deemed that you have removed the seats permanently, your vehicle will be defected and you will require modification approval for reduced seating capacity.

A number of people who have been defected for this - especially those who have fridges or drawers where the seats normally go (even if they argue that they remove them between trips).

This applies in all states AFAIK. Even for vehicles where you can remove the seats without tools. How well it is enforced however varies between states.

**roverrescue** · 4th March 2011, 02:26 PM

Well how about that - maybe someone does care

Bored transport officers!!!

S

**Drew90** · 4th March 2011, 04:30 PM

WEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOWWWWEEEEEOOOOOOO

I think I hear the Fun Police again.

Dear tax paying hard working Australian.... Sorry but because no one these days can be responsible for their own actions we have to make laws deciding what every can and can't do. Your currently eating with your fork incorrectly, I going to have to fine you.

OVER IT.

LouisW · 7th September 2014, 11:19 AM

I have just ordered a new 90 and DONT need or want the rear seats. I have no intentions of ever selling it.

My question is if I register the car new as TWO seater. After the dealer has removed the rear seats and seat-belts. Do I still need a blue slip as a modification? Has anyone done this in before ?

IMHO I think the 90 looks stupid with the rear seats the Defender was never intended to be a 4 seater that's why there is a 110. Why land rover don't give you the option not to have rear seat baffles me.

Regs Louis.

**FeatherWeightDriver** · 7th September 2014, 12:28 PM

Pretty sure you can't register a new 90 as a 2 seater, as the compliance plate will say 4 seater. What is the upside of registering as a 2 seater?

Either way just because it has compliance as a 4 seater, that does not stop you ripping out the back 2 seats and leaving them out.

The only downside I can think of the usual hassles of putting a tethered child seat in, but that's an issue with all Defenders as is anyway...

**isuzurover** · 7th September 2014, 01:34 PM

Originally Posted by Louis Werth

...

My question is if I register the car new as TWO seater. After the dealer has removed the rear seats and seat-belts. Do I still need a blue slip as a modification? Has anyone done this in before ?

...

As above, the issue is what is on the compliance plate. So unless the dealer can deliver the vehicle with a compliance plate that says 2 seater then you need modification approval.

**weeds** · 7th September 2014, 02:03 PM

Just rip the seats out..........and get out and use it.

There must be a thousand rigs out there with seats removed......

Not sure we have to bash on about legalities over and over in the one thread. Agree always good to highlight it once to the OP just in case he is un-aware, than leave it to the owner to make the call.

**defender_i_hardly_know_er** · 7th September 2014, 08:20 PM

After removing the rear seats in mine - Vicroads said I *could* have it changed to say 2 Seats, but there was no reason to - and in case I ever put them back it would be easier.

I also called my insurer (AAMI) and asked them if there were any implications. They thought I was doing to become a courier and were more concerned about the purpose of the vehicle (business use or whatever) - They then said no issues and we've made a note in my file to say as such.

So yeah - just do it.

LouisW · 8th September 2014, 09:31 AM

So to Summarise:

It's not legal but someone (The Bill) will need to be really pedantic to stop and fine you.

Rip them out; keep them; keep quite and get on with Life!

My take is - there seems to be a lot of pain and burocracy in complying to eliminate a very low risk?

Thanks Guys

**Leroy_Riding** · 8th September 2014, 10:06 AM

Ill answer from the original question, and disregard the whole legal argument.

i pulled the rears out of my 90 nearly as soon as I got it home, my rear draw system is near enough to permanently mounted (carpet glued over bolt holes and screws) I purchased the car with the intention of never using the rears, like Karl B i left the seat belts as I understood this to be the 'legal' requirement however I am unsure. I have been pulled over many a time for RBT's and one for speeding (oops!) and not once been questioned about the lack of rear seats in the car, I have been questioned over pushbikes obstructing number plate (now have a accessory plate) and about lack of mudflaps on my home built trailer (that has sharp edges and all still as its not finished but is registered and used!) but nothing about the draws.

so on that note.
remove the seats, if you are not putting draws in you can either gaffer tape over the holes or you can put the bolts back in. before i put my draws in i had the bolts in.
now with the home made draws in i use the lower seat bolts to hold the box in, and the seat belt bolts to hold the top in. all other holes are gaffer taped up with rubber over the top/under the draws to help with noise and vibration. the holes are all painted so no need to prime them or anything (well at least on mine they were?)

you will need torques bits to get them out though (star headed bits)

my 2c
Leroy.

Thread: Removing Rear 90 Puma seats

Thread Tools

90 new seat removed

Thanks ! re new 90 Seats

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions