To quote an earlier post:
A friend once told me to think of a Defender as a giant meccano set that comes preassembled from the factory. If you expect Lexus reliability and build quality, you'll come away dissapointed. If however, you can live with the fact that you may from time to time have to reassemble some of its components to get it just right, then you're ready for defender ownership. Or rather, you'll find defender ownership a satisfactory experience.
If you're after a 130, you'd probably be looking at either a Tdi or a Td5 engine, both of which have been proven reliable. They have been around long enough so that their potantial faults are well known. So long as preventative maintenance is carried out, they should be reliable and trouble free. A new Puma 130 is also an option (powered by a Ford 2.4l turbodiesel out of a Transit van mated to a 6 speed gearbox), but they're relatively young and still have some teething problems (I could be wrong here - somebody please correct me if I am).
Td5's have a brain (ECU) which doesn't like water, oil, excessive vibration and the like, and if/when it starts playing up may take some troubleshooting to diagnose and fix. They are on the other hand more powerful and refined than their predecessors, and can readily be tweaked by brainwashing. Pre 2002 Defender 110s had a stronger (salisbury type) rear diff, after which they changed to a weaker (rover type) one.
The Tdi's are completely mechanical, so there are no electronics to go wrong. Thought by some to be more reliable for remote area travel, they are also a bit rougher and don't have as much power. Two variants were available - 200Tdi made between '91 and '93 (or sometime in 94?) which came with a weaker 5 speed (LT77) gearbox and the later 300Tdi (94 to 98) which came with a stronger 5 speed (R380) gearbox.
Between '81 and '90, Land Rovers also came fitted with an Isuzu 4BD1 engine (the civilian equivalent of an army 110 "Perentie"). These are the roughest out of the lot, but thought to be the holy grail of reliability (completely mechanical, and designed to pull a 6t truck). In their naturally aspirated form, they are a bit gutless compared with their younger (turbocharged) siblings, but where they lack in power they make up in low down torque. They also respond well to turbocharging, and can go as well as a V8 at 1.5 to 2 x the fuel efficiency. Unfortunately, they were never fitted to a 130 out of the factory, and your better half may require some serious convincing before agreeing to one. Don't ask me how I know.
That should get you started. The pros and cons of each engine have been covered in many a thread on these forums, so have a read through, decide which one best suits your purposes (and budget) and then make up your own mind if you're ready to take the next step.
Good luck.
Bojan


 
					
					
 
				
				
				
					 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
						
					 
						
					 Originally Posted by Vern
 Originally Posted by Vern
					

 
				 
						
					 
						
					 
						
					 
						
					 
						
					
Bookmarks