Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 110

Thread: 235/85R16 vs 255/85R16

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Connolly, WA
    Posts
    1,671
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I’m almost embarrassed to admit that I have to agree with flagg. My Puma now has 16,000 km on it and the General Grabbers look like new! The only reason I’ve not changed them for my preferred 265/75/16 KM2’s is that I’m struggling to justify the expense! I’ve been around in the Pilbara on the red rock and the dunes at Lancelin and almost everything in between (except deep mud, I must admit) and they’ve not let me down once. Not a mark on them and just about all the tread left!
    Still looking to buy the muddies, but I honestly can’t badmouth the original Grabbers for what they are!

  2. #52
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed
    you guys running 255's and towing either #1 have some serious grunt under the bonnet, #2 dont tow much weight at all, or #3 never drive on anything but level ground and hwy stuff.....

    IMO of course
    Please explain....

    How can a tyre size increase of 3.8% kill that much power?

    Running a 265-75-16 places more rolling resistance on the driveline.

    If a defender is struggling to tow etc on 255s it's in need of a mechanical check up.

    Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ourimbah
    Posts
    409
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by flagg View Post
    I've done quite of a bit off highway, mud, rock etc with these.. and found them to be great. how did they disappoint?
    Sorry, I should have been more specific. The General Grabbers cake up with mud / clay and become slicks. The tread has no gaps in it around the perimeter. Why is this?

    They will probably last 80,000km, so my plan is to put them on a second set of rims as they are great for highway driving and towing.

    Beckford.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Whats funny is my Puma came with Goodyear Wrangler mud terrains but I really want Conti Cross Contacts that the standard model comes with. Pat

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SYDNEY -in the shire.....
    Posts
    8,196
    Total Downloaded
    0
    general grabbers.......i threw out my first set at 80,000kms......only because i scored a new set.......
    they would have done another 20,000kms.....and thats without rotating the spare in......and pretty much driving like on a racetrack.........
    the traction control would even kick in on corners and roundabouts.......so that means lots of abuse and minimal wear......

    they got me through all sorts of terrain where others went with muddies and all terrains.....they did struggle in mud......and had to be aired down to 12psi.....but they still got me through.......



    as for sizes......i was told that the correct tyre size for a defender is 255 85 R16.....
    BUT.....they come out from the factory with 235 85 R16.......which makes the speedo read more than you are actually doing.....so you can blame land rover if you get done for speeding i guess......

    i am currently running 33 12.5 R15 on my 03 fender.......and havent had any problems.....it has corrected my speedo.....so i know what speed im doing......
    and its the difference in take off is not noticeable........
    i do have a mild chip though......but even chipped.....the defenders struggle on take off with the factory tyres..........
    i think first gear should be slightly lower......ive always had to slip the clutch more than i like taking off up hill.....especially when towing......
    but once moving......theres no stopping......it drives just fine......

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    you guys running 255's and towing either #1 have some serious grunt under the bonnet, #2 dont tow much weight at all, or #3 never drive on anything but level ground and hwy stuff.....

    IMO of course
    Isuzu*

    Quote Originally Posted by Beckford View Post
    Sorry, I should have been more specific. The General Grabbers cake up with mud / clay and become slicks. The tread has no gaps in it around the perimeter. Why is this?

    They will probably last 80,000km, so my plan is to put them on a second set of rims as they are great for highway driving and towing.

    Beckford.
    Ah fair enough - that is their only weakness really.


    * and I'm not afraid to drop it to low range on the big hills.
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Brisbane
    Posts
    1,926
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    you guys running 255's and towing either #1 have some serious grunt under the bonnet, #2 dont tow much weight at all, or #3 never drive on anything but level ground and hwy stuff.....

    IMO of course
    I have 255/85 on my Puma, we tow a Jayco Swan outback loaded to service 4 children, whilst the Defender carries the 5 of us and a Waeco, I reckon thats a fair load to haul.


    Power/torque has not been an issue for me....

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Please explain....

    How can a tyre size increase of 3.8% kill that much power?

    Running a 265-75-16 places more rolling resistance on the driveline.

    If a defender is struggling to tow etc on 255s it's in need of a mechanical check up.

    Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
    3.8% of nothing is still nothing...10 years of towing a 1.8tonne dual axle behind a very light 110 C/C with a stock 300tdi, then modded and now a 2.8tgv tells me better. Yes it will do it but if you consider safety as being being able to move with taffic, merge, climb rises, let alone hills all within reason of todays speeds and ontop of that consider egts and engine temps in summer..............

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NOZ View Post
    I have 255/85 on my Puma, we tow a Jayco Swan outback loaded to service 4 children, whilst the Defender carries the 5 of us and a Waeco, I reckon thats a fair load to haul.


    Power/torque has not been an issue for me....
    I have no experince with a puma engine. Im guessing the low first gear and electronic engine management play a part in this. The other things is 2 different people have 2 different ideas of doing a filling a job requirement.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    gordonvale
    Posts
    77
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    you guys running 255's and towing either #1 have some serious grunt under the bonnet, #2 dont tow much weight at all, or #3 never drive on anything but level ground and hwy stuff.....

    IMO of course

    ??? I ran 255/85 KM2s for a while and towed quite a bit. Im running a stock 300tdi with a pyro and the High fuel cranked to achieve a max turbo temp of 650 C and Im no rocket ship but I dont have probems achieving any legal speed in a reasonable time/distance and Ive surprised a few people maintaining 100km hr on hills they couldnt.

    Im now on 255/100 16s (36inch) but with custom diffs so thats a DIFFerent story

Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!