Rest assured if they cock up the new Deefer I'll be looking for a way to secure one of these instead.
With all the Defender replacement threads, I thought I might post what I believe is the vehicle closest to what the Defender should be.
Like the Defender it is a lineal descendent of the WW2 Jeep. Like the Defender replacement it was a ground-up redesign. Like generations of Land Rovers it is a military vehicle.
The Jeep J8
Military Jeep J8 road test
Steve
2003 Discovery 2a
In better care:
1992 Defender
1963 Series IIa Ambulance
1977 Series III Ex-Army
1988 County V8
1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
REMLR No. 215
Rest assured if they cock up the new Deefer I'll be looking for a way to secure one of these instead.
I hope VM diesels have improved???
Looks good, but I would take a g-wagen Professional over that.
G-wagen has lockers, coil rear and a 3L engine...
However the Jeep does have rear discs.
the perentie.
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
The issue with the GW Pro is the price: over here they go for USD$100,000.
For that price I can buy two Puma Defenders.
Jeep J8 looks good, I just hope the control arms are stronger than stock.
Rear leaf springs are better for load carrying than coils.
It is not clear to me that this is the case. The only reason would be that the coil carries the load at one point on the chassis where the leaf spring carries it at two, but surely any advantage for one or the other depends on the chassis design. On the other hand, the coil has no load concentration on a moving joint as the leaf spring does at the eyes.
The other primary difference, that the coil separates the location, torque reaction, and damping functions from the support function seems to me to be independent of load.
You can argue that unloaded/loaded springing can easily be arranged with leaf springs by having a separate overload pack, but you can do the same sort of thing with coils as well, for example with concentric springs or tapered springs.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Sounds like the ideal tourer to me:
"We find that the suspension is flexible when crawling, and the high spring rates work great when running fast, but it feels really bad in medium driving speeds on the washboard roads. The semi-elliptic leaf spring setup is simply too hard when not fully loaded."
Just how do you fit a tonne of gear to settle the rear end when all you have a is a poxy little dog box behind the rear seats??? Maybe youll need to ute-efy one.
I wonder if the ne european VM still has four leaky head gaskets or if they have economised and now only have one leaky gasket???
The solution to LR destroying the new defender is to just keep an old one.
S
'95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
'10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)
It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".
gone
1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
1996 Discovery 1
current
1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks