Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: New Defender - Have your say

  1. #1
    islu51 Guest

    New Defender - Have your say

    Farmers weekly UK, is looking for comments on what people would like to see in the new defender...on behalf on Land Rover...

    New Land Rover Defender

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0

  3. #3
    deffender Guest
    what a piece o crapola hope it doesnt acutally come out like that

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    193
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just received the October edition of Land Rover Monthly magazine from the U.K. The news article on page 10 mentions that Land Rover might ditch the Defender or extend the life of the current one (again, again, again) with more efficient engines even past the new 2.2 (I presume). It says the 2.2 will meet emissions regs until 2016.

    Extending the life again does not worry me but ditching the model completely - OMG!!!! Other options include a Defender based on the expensive Discovery and Range Rover Sport chassis apparently. I think that the longer Land Rover dithers around with this and does not commit the more likely the Defender will go, sad to say. I hope LRO magazine has better news.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    CNS, FNQ
    Posts
    511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I dont understand why the current 2.4L or 2.2L engine is only good till 2016 when the land cruisers are getting around with 4.5L V8?



    Hay Ewe

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    They don't sell 4.5ltr cruisers in Europe or any other country that has the latest pollution laws,LR have fitted 2.5ltr engines as in many countries the road tax is based on engine size or what comes out of the pipe,the reason the defender has got the 2.2 now. Pat

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    5,778
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IMO land rover don't need a completely new shape as the existing one is quite functional. They should look at improvements done to the Jeep wrangler and Benz G wagon. The following is a list of changes I would make to improve the Defender or its production cost:
    • zinc roof
    • single piece zinc firewall, passenger floor, b-pillar (made so welds can be drilled out to replace each of these as required)
    • retain alloy tub and have dropside tray as dual cab option
    • side storage like Army 110 with high fuel filler point (reduce likelihood of water entering and easy to fill from jerry) lots of other storage compartments inside
    • LSD front and rear as standard to strengthen both diffs
    • rack & pinion steering
    • better placement of ECU to reduce risk of water/dust inundation
    • auto as an option
    • two spring specs - high capacity for commercial/touring and lower/softer for mix city/occ offroad.
    L322 tdv8 poverty pack - wow
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 49-107 (probably selling) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc.
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 48-699 another project
    Track Trailer ARN 200-117
    REMLR # 137

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    cairns
    Posts
    1,675
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    They don't sell 4.5ltr cruisers in Europe or any other country that has the latest pollution laws,LR have fitted 2.5ltr engines as in many countries the road tax is based on engine size or what comes out of the pipe,the reason the defender has got the 2.2 now. Pat
    All good points Pat!
    But I don't understand why the 2.7 TD from the D3 couldn't have been an option.
    More expensive? Yes more than likely and maybe some engineering to make it fit but I certainly would have been willing to pay the extra $$.
    I am quite happy with my tweaked TD5 but out on the highway towing anything of size the 2.7 would have done it for me.
    Paul.

    77 series3 (sold)
    95 300Tdi Ute (sold)
    2003 XTREME Td5

    I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

  9. #9
    dominicbeirne Guest

    New Defender on smh.com.au

    Take a look at this link
    Convertible Land Rover Defender

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by harro View Post
    All good points Pat!
    But I don't understand why the 2.7 TD from the D3 couldn't have been an option.
    More expensive? Yes more than likely and maybe some engineering to make it fit but I certainly would have been willing to pay the extra $$.
    I am quite happy with my tweaked TD5 but out on the highway towing anything of size the 2.7 would have done it for me.
    You have to remember about vehicle placement.People who pay 80K for a D4 don't want a 50K defender to have the same motor/gearbox,same as a person who spends 150K on a RR doesn't want a D4 owner having the TDV8.It sounds silly but thats the way it works.Being a Puma owner I really like the 2.4,it punches well above it's weight but I also don't tow a van or boat so can't comment on that. Pat

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!