Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Puma Fuel economy on larger tyres

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,576
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cal415 View Post
    140L tank would be nice, is that a Long ranger tank with small side tank? i cant beleive they only put a 75L in a 130, it seems crazy, even the disco has a bigger tank.
    Hey cal,

    It is a Long range Automotive (LRA) tank, out of melbourne.

    long range auxiliary & replacement fuel & water tanks for 4WDs | Designed & manufactured in Australia by LONGRANGE AUTOMOTIVE since 1989

    All one piece, fits with sway bar and factory tow bar. Very neat fit.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Medowie N.S.W
    Posts
    494
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The width is what would make the difference with those sizes Mick, a 255 will drive much nicer. You've got them there try them both and see.
    You still gotta bring it in for me to have a look at.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stellenbosch, Republic of the Western Cape, RSA
    Posts
    662
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The bigger tyres leads to increased consumption is a myth.

    Remember, when you change the tyre size, your odometer reading also goes off. So now you are calculating consumption based on an inaccurate reading of the mileage

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The fuel usage on my Puma with an Alive remap is the same no matter what set of tyres I put on. Today I am running Mickey Thomson 305/70x16 Baja ATZ on alloys with a built in 30mm offset. In the summer I use the standard boosts with 235/85x16 and for mud plugging I use 265/75x16 BFG MT on modulars. The speedo is also accurate with the 305's compared to the 235's which put it out by a couple of mph on the slow side. I have found that the wider the tyre the better the ride even in deep snow where normally a thinner tyre would be best as it cuts through and offers less resistance. Here is a link to a tyre calculator which gives a good visual indication to different tyre sizes:

    Tire size calculator

  5. #15
    Nera Donna Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lorryman100 View Post
    The fuel usage on my Puma with an Alive remap is the same no matter what set of tyres I put on. Today I am running Mickey Thomson 305/70x16 Baja ATZ on alloys with a built in 30mm offset. In the summer I use the standard boosts with 235/85x16 and for mud plugging I use 265/75x16 BFG MT on modulars. The speedo is also accurate with the 305's compared to the 235's which put it out by a couple of mph on the slow side. I have found that the wider the tyre the better the ride even in deep snow where normally a thinner tyre would be best as it cuts through and offers less resistance. Here is a link to a tyre calculator which gives a good visual indication to different tyre sizes:

    Tire size calculator

    Excellent little tyre calculator Lorryman. Thanks for that. I’ve been using an old and tattered tyre spec leaflet I’ve had for around 20 years. This one is a really little rip snorter.
    Cheers

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Stockton, NSW
    Posts
    2,769
    Total Downloaded
    0
    well just filled up tonight, worst tank yet, 600km on the dot with 68l fill.

    I will be putting the tyres on sometime this week, running the 255s i guess i will see how it goes.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    600,whats wrong with mine then. Pat

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Stockton, NSW
    Posts
    2,769
    Total Downloaded
    0
    driving style maybe? heavy right foot? i guess i have given it a bit more right foot this tank, driving has been a mix of city driving and drive to work in stop start traffic but in 80-90k zones all the way.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Stockton, NSW
    Posts
    2,769
    Total Downloaded
    0
    well for the 285's vs 255s vs 7.50x16s, so far i am noticing little difference, last 2 tanks first one on 255s i got 540km before the light came on filled up shortly after at 62L then next time on 285s 570km before the light came on filled up at just under 600km with 63L, all very similar driving, city and highway combined.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Stockton, NSW
    Posts
    2,769
    Total Downloaded
    0
    worst tank yet, no real highway driving this time, few runs on 80-90kph areas and about 4 hours of beach driving, light came on at 525km, this is on 285s still. Overall i found this to be a good sign considering the beach driving involved and some driving heavily loaded up with stuff in the tray.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!