Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: 32s or 33s?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MLD View Post
    [snip]

    The 255/85 BFG KM2's have a marginally larger rolling diameter to the comparable sized Maaxis bighorns. The Bighorns are significantly cheaper.

    [snip]

    cheers MLD
    I think you might find it's the other way around on the charts, (from memory about 5mm taller for the 762) but probably well within manufacturing tolerances in the real world.

    When I measured up my 762's when new and inflated @ 30psi on 6.5" rims they measured pretty dead on the designated diameter (2650mm = 844mm unloaded diameter)

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Stanwell Park, NSW
    Posts
    1,667
    Total Downloaded
    666.1 KB
    Rick130 - there you go, my lesson for the day. BFG's Aust and US website doesn't quote rolling circumference.

    5mm could be evened out by a weekend crawling up rocks.http://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/smilies/ohmy.gif

    cheers MLD

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Circumference is the easiest way to measure diameter if you have a tape, just divide by pi.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,576
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MLD View Post
    Drover - if you go with the 285/75R16 you might not get them on the 16 x 7" rim. Be a shame if you had to change from your SVX rims.cheers MLD
    Thanks MLD,

    Planning on getting a set of 6 black 16 x 8 steels wheels at the same time.

    Going to use them just for trips and the SVX wheel and GG's for road use and around town.

    I do agree that a 265 is max width on a 7" rim.

    Cheers

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,535
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Drover View Post
    Leaning toward Mickey Thompson Baja MTZ's but BFG KM2's are also under consideration.

    I have got quotes for KM2's - $350 ad Baja MTZ's - $359.

    Price is much the same, any opinions on these brands/tyres ?
    The only feed back I have is a mate has just done a lap of Aus towing a trailer with MT MTZ's, he just replaced them with the same.
    Half way round he was talking up BFG KM2's as many people had them and they seemed to be holding up well from his observations. This is surprising as his not big on BFG.
    I have driven a lot with a Defer mate who runs Maxxis Bighorns, they have done all my XZL's have, but haven't worn like mine, and are far cheaper.
    that's all I know.

    PS, I use the Explore Aus tyre calculator to work out tyre size.
    Jason

    2010 130 TDCi

  6. #46
    Freestyler Guest
    Hi Jeff I have been running BFG 33 x 10.5's Muddies on my truck over 10 years now. Bit taller but not too wide I have found them to be a good all round tyre. Ive been on the beach, in the desert, through mud and over rocks. I run them in the bush at 20psi and have very little issues. OK milliage and very few flat tyres. I have a V8 County 4.4 Ltr EFI so I have horse power to burn but I did notice a difference with the old 7.50 16's. Looks realy stupid now after the 33's for so long and I wont be going back.
    Tim

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,652
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi all

    I am currently looking at getting a set of Dynamic 16 x 8 with 25mm offset rims and a set of Mickey Thompson MTZ's in 285/75/16's for my 1998 300TDi 130.

    I have always had BFG's either mud terrains (on my previous Range Rover 35") and currently all terrains on the 130 (standard 235/85 16) . So why the change to MTZ's? I am not keen on the BFG KM2 pattern. I prefer the old style BFG mud terrain pattern but it is now unavailable (be happy to be told different!)

    The only issue at the moment? I have only 40mm clearance between the roof of the truck and my garage roller door and I hope the change in size up to 285's means I can still fit the truck into the garage.

    And....I will be looking at swapping bonnets - one without the spare wheel carrier as there is no way I will be putting a 285/75 tyre on the bonnet!

    Cheers
    Andrew
    Andrew
    1998 Landrover Defender 300Tdi 130 HCPU Expedition
    1972 Peugeot 504 Sedan - Daily Driver

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!