Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Suspension for 130 HCPU dual cab??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Newman, WA
    Posts
    19
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Suspension for 130 HCPU dual cab??

    Please help!

    I have purchased a new 130 dual cab (not tub, steel tray) and looking for information in regards to a 2inch lift, and upgrade of the shockies, if I need too? I know it's a HCPU, but with suspension I am unsure what this means. I need it to carry a fair bit of weight, roof top camper and bull bar front, 140L in excess fuel and also a quad on the tray. Any ideas of brands and ideas will be taken on board, as many places I have called to inquire, don't really want to help me out.

    Thanks guys in advance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Traveling Aus
    Posts
    639
    Total Downloaded
    0
    yours is a band new one yeah?

    don't like stock suspension or are you after some more height?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Northern Hunter Valley,Dungog Shire
    Posts
    478
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Middo, I am not an expert but I have the impression, mostly from threads on this forum, that raising the suspension on the more recent Defenders causes some trouble, particularly in the front drive line. Have you had a chance to see how it goes with the loads you mention on the standard set up? My 130 goes really well on the standard suspension apart from having double shockies on the rear to control bounce when heavily loaded. Cheers, 130man.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I would agree with the other post, the 130 be it a hcpu or tray , is fine in standard form, after all it is classed as heavy duty.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    DON'T change a thing!! The standard 130 HCPU suspension is better than most aftermarket stuff by a mile, only thing I'd change is shocks IF you are pounding it fully loaded over horrific terrain. Koni Raid 90's are the go.... Factory shocks are now gas charged unlike the early models, so are quite good actually. I have gone to considerable effort with my 110 to find some factory 130 spec rear suspension, as it is very good for heavy load carrying and especially towing.
    This link will shed some light on the konis... http://www.beadelltours.com.au/shock_absorbers.html


    JC

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Burra NSW
    Posts
    933
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I run 3 single cab 130s for my business,(2 td5,1 puma) we have custom built heavy steel trays, tools and a 600 litre fuel tank, I have been really impressed with the standard suspension as the vehicles run at about 3.1-3.5 t gvm. Having said that, one of the Td5 vehicles is fitted with extra heavy duty tough dog coils and shocks all round as it was fitted with a drilling rig rather than a tray before I bought it. The vehicle was almost undrivable if unloaded and needs about 800 kgs in the tray to settle it down, I've had 2.1 ton in the tray and it still sat pretty flat. As a compromise I would stick with the standard 130 suspension, it needs to be loaded to get the flex out of the coils and get a good on road ride..hope this helps

  7. #7
    Jack Isa Guest
    Standard is fine if your carrying your lunch to work...King Springs all round a pair 5psi bag in the rear and Bilstein shocks all round. do the steering dampener while you are at it. I fiited the lot about 2 years ago the difference over the standard was amazing. cheers Jack

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Isa View Post
    Standard is fine if your carrying your lunch to work...King Springs all round a pair 5psi bag in the rear and Bilstein shocks all round. do the steering dampener while you are at it. I fiited the lot about 2 years ago the difference over the standard was amazing. cheers Jack

    Are you talking of a 130 with dual rear coils ?

    I tare @ 3000kg most all the time (been over the weighbridge) and have removed the inner coils for better ride/more flex.

    I'd need to be at or above GVM to justify the extra 140lb coils.

    [edit] this is in a '98 130CC

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Shocks: Koni or Bilstein are the only 2 worth changing the OEM out for.

    Springs: this is more a personal feel due to requirements and how you like it to ride. I have a 110 (yep its a different beast to the 130) I had the 320lb oem springs and found it to choppy for me. It is a tray back and when Im not towing I have very little weight on it (alloy tray) I run 250lb kings, no air bags.....even with the high towing km's I do I like it....now if it were more my toy I would go lighter again....

    Listen to JC and Rick they will have a very good feel and understanding of the 130 and its OEM springs.....I doubt it worth the $$$ and trouble to do them....shocks yes....springs maybe not...unless you really want to play with things and get an old Boge Loadleveller and change the whole set up...but I doubt that.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Newman, WA
    Posts
    19
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for all the info people, it's appreciated. Is it possible to keep the standard shocks as most of you stated and to lift it by 2inch?? sorry I am new to all this, and what would I need to buy to do it.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!