Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Anti-stall question...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    453
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Djan1,

    This is off topic I Know. But since I disconnected the clutch switch from mine I can take off from idle in second (on flat to nearly flat ground). Before there was no chance. In fact disconnecting the clutch switch makes the vehicle so much better to drive on and off road it's quite remarkable. Seems I have been battling against it for years.

    Ian.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    878
    Total Downloaded
    0
    mools is that on a td5 or puma?

    btw I read this....

    http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic579.html

    has anyone tried it on their tdci? apparently disconnecting does nothing. You have to short the two wires

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mools View Post
    Get your facts straight, buddy. .

    I won't say correct because a fact is by definition correct. An incorrect fact is an oxymoron.

    ...SNIP...

    A td5 has idle revs of 750. The feature definitely only works on low 1st too. Idle in 1st low is at the same 759 rpm.

    Ian.


    I deliberately used the word 'Approx'... The TD5 & TDCi have different idle speeds and on top of that, the TDCi increases the idle speed in 1st low.

    BTW - My favourite 'Oxymoron' is "US Military Intelligence".

    M

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I was watching a YouTube video with Defender and cruiser 70 comparison. They made a point that the antistall feature actually gives the defender less control on steep downhill in low range causing it to run faster. Is this true? BTW am picking up my new 110 in 4 weeks.

    Cheers

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    878
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think it is. I've only ever taken james offroad once but I found myself having to step on the clutch at times to stop from going too fast.. but then i was in high. that might have had something to do with it lol

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Connolly, WA
    Posts
    1,671
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectDirector View Post
    I was watching a YouTube video with Defender and cruiser 70 comparison. They made a point that the antistall feature actually gives the defender less control on steep downhill in low range causing it to run faster. Is this true? BTW am picking up my new 110 in 4 weeks.

    Cheers
    Can't say I've ever come across this... I've been down angles steep enough to need resting your weight on the steering with arms outstretched and I've never had it overrun.

    The golden rules of steep down hills are:

    Low Range Differential Locked (no compromise on this!)

    1. No clutch
    2. NO CLUTCH!!!
    3. If in doubt step on the accelerator to regain traction and steering
    4. Use the foot brake sparingly if you've lost your planned line...

    The Puma's firsts low is so slow (when not interfered with clutch use!) that there is physically no way of not having control.

    Any control loss would usually be attributed to the driver starting to panic and not trusting his car...

    Cheers,

    Lou

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectDirector View Post
    I was watching a YouTube video with Defender and cruiser 70 comparison. They made a point that the antistall feature actually gives the defender less control on steep downhill in low range causing it to run faster. Is this true? BTW am picking up my new 110 in 4 weeks.

    Cheers
    No, that's utter twaddle...

    If the ECU detects the car is in Low-1st, the idle speed is deliberately raised to 1000rpm. This is called the 'Idle Jack' and nothing to do with 'Anti-Stall'. As stated before ALL EFi systems have an element of anti-stall...

    The reason for this is that 1st-Low is soooo low, it actually increased the risk of the car sliding on a very steep slope. The idle speed is raised a touch, to help reduce this risk.

    M

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    midwest W.A
    Posts
    426
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have found on rocky ground some times the car won't go slow enough and it's "jerky". Would disabling the anti stall cure this?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SYDNEY -in the shire.....
    Posts
    8,196
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There are a few clips on YouTube showing what the anti stall is capable of......here's just one of them........

    It works simply on revs....has nothing to do with what gear it's in on the td5.....or whether its in high or low range..........



    ► 1:45► 1:45
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jhuKLrjJLg]Land Rover Defender Towing a 12 Tonne Truck. - YouTube[/ame]
    Feb 2, 2009 - Uploaded by Timberpants
    Defender's brochure tow spec is 3.5 tonnes. ... and fianally the truck applies its brakes - will ...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Loubrey View Post

    Can't say I've ever come across this... I've been down angles steep enough to need resting your weight on the steering with arms outstretched and I've never had it overrun.

    The golden rules of steep down hills are:

    Low Range Differential Locked (no compromise on this!)

    1. No clutch
    2. NO CLUTCH!!!
    3. If in doubt step on the accelerator to regain traction and steering
    4. Use the foot brake sparingly if you've lost your planned line...

    The Puma's firsts low is so slow (when not interfered with clutch use!) that there is physically no way of not having control.

    Any control loss would usually be attributed to the driver starting to panic and not trusting his car...

    Cheers,

    Lou
    Agree all the way with you on all your points, all they were saying is that it didn't have enough engine compression to hold the vehicle steady. I will find the video tonight and post the link. Not sure if those guys were biased!

    Cheers

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!