Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Landrover 110 leg space

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Did you put any of the original spacers back under the front of the rails?

    Without any spacers the front of the seat is too low and feels funny. By packing the front of the seat up you get a better angle, more support under your thighs and it doesn’t raise your seating position.

    Cheers,
    Jon

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jon3950 View Post
    Did you put any of the original spacers back under the front of the rails?

    Without any spacers the front of the seat is too low and feels funny. By packing the front of the seat up you get a better angle, more support under your thighs and it doesn’t raise your seating position.

    Cheers,
    Jon
    I dont agree with rasing the front of the seat. The more of an angle up the thighs/knees are from the back and lower back, I find more problems and yes with the legs getting stiff etc. I would raise the rear of the seat before the front as the angle is already at or past 90 from thighs to spine.

    Im 6.1 driving a truck cab so know the 110 cab problems more than 4 door versions.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Fair enough, we’re all different. I find it more comfortable with front the packed up a bit so I don’t feel like I’m sliding down the seat.

    Cheers,
    Jon

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jon3950 View Post
    Fair enough, we’re all different. I find it more comfortable with front the packed up a bit so I don’t feel like I’m sliding down the seat.

    Cheers,
    Jon
    Is your seat all compressed?? The seat box is angled up towards the front and the seat base itself is higher/thicker at the front. Head scratching.....

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No, seat is good - it's only two years old.

    Fitting the Mulgo rails on their own lifts the rear of the seat but not the front. Obviously this changes the angle of the seat base. Adding spacers to the front basically returns it to it's original angle, which is more comfortable for me.

    I've replaced the Mulgo rails with Mud rails as I was concerned that the Mulgo rails were letting the seat rails flex slightly and opening them up. The Mud rails sit very slightly higher which I really noticed at first but am now used to. I think these would probably put anyone taller than me (6') too high relative to the windscreen.

    I'm happy with the seating position now and find it very comfortable for a long trip - so it's all good.

    Cheers,
    Jon

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    74
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I remember the 1st time I sat in a Defender, I thought to myself you have to be joking this is the worst Ergonomic cockpit I have ever sat in. It didnt stop me from purchasing my 130.
    For some reason it just works, Im 6'3" and feel like farmer Bill driving his tractor and love it, love being able to lean against the pillar,my favorite position is when my elbow is out and lm huging the door, my mate wore though the paint in his old Defender where his arm hung out the window. It just works for me, I can can drive for days and still have a grinn on my face.I still have a grinn on my face every time I start her up in the morning.Landrover 110 leg spaceLandrover 110 leg space

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bj4x4 View Post
    Is leg room pretty much the same between the 110 wagon and 110 single cab ute?
    [edit] oops, I didn't notice the date of the post I was replying to!

    No.

    In the wagons and crew cabs you can lift the seat rails 19-22mm and the rails then slide over the seat box bulkhead giving much more legroom.
    This is ideal if you re over 180cm and long of leg.
    You can't do this in a single cab, unless you can find a rare TD5 Telstra extended cab version

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NovaRover View Post
    I remember the 1st time I sat in a Defender, I thought to myself you have to be joking this is the worst Ergonomic cockpit I have ever sat in. It didnt stop me from purchasing my 130.
    For some reason it just works, Im 6'3" and feel like farmer Bill driving his tractor and love it, love being able to lean against the pillar,my favorite position is when my elbow is out and lm huging the door, my mate wore though the paint in his old Defender where his arm hung out the window. It just works for me, I can can drive for days and still have a grinn on my face.I still have a grinn on my face every time I start her up in the morning.Landrover 110 leg spaceLandrover 110 leg space

    The problem with the length and width of the Defender is not just leg room. As you decribe, many LR owners drive with the window down and elbow/arm resting on outer door edge. My paint is worn through also... This is not done out of desire or some romantic notion, its because of the lack of space. Now even in a 110 truck cab with the seat back, this driving postion, with the shoulder againts piller and elbow out rolls the shoulder forward. Rolled shoulders are a big problem in general life these days - work - life etc. As the shoulder rolls forward it comes down out of its joint. Now not being fully supported. This becomes the normal postion and is much more prone to injury or problems. This would be further amplified the further the seat goes back.

    The doors really need to be 6 inches longer. 4 for seat travel and 2 to allow the shoulder to square up....

    just my opinion

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sometimes its a case of if you have never had better, you dont know any different...

    *My Pa (dad) is impressed with how well the a/c works on his Defender TD5 (his old 200/300tdi, series never had a/c).
    *Defender TDCi (puma) 2007 on the a/c dare I say is of the standard you would expect for a commercial vehicle.
    *Both myself and Pa have never had an issue with where the handbrake lever sits, in fact think its way easier to get to when offroading.
    *As mentioned, seat base extensions are a good option.
    *My Pa complains about the position of the window winder (always has) and wants it converted to the sliding window set up which I have been very slow to act upon. Would rather fit electric windows.
    *Neither of us has ever had an issue with how the seat sits close to the door, when off road you tend to tilt your head slightly left to prevent hitting door frame.
    *Yes with the seat base extensions on, the door closeness is more noticeable.

    *All subjective I guess but I prefer sitting (and even driving) in a Defender over the mining spec Land Cruiser, Discovery 2, Discovery 3.
    Regards
    Daz


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!