Page 85 of 105 FirstFirst ... 3575838485868795 ... LastLast
Results 841 to 850 of 1045

Thread: All discussions relating to the Defenders end of production

  1. #841
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The Ford is just an 'interim' vehicle. I am waiting (patiently) to see what the new Defender is going to be.

    By the time they release it, it will be 2018. Then 2 years of user testing to see what breaks and needs re-designing. They'll do a 'facelift' model with all the fixes.

    So about 2020 would be a good time to buy a new Defender I reckon

    I was a guinea pig with one of the first PUMAs in Aust, so won't be doing that again!

  2. #842
    MrLandy Guest
    No such thing as an interim vehicle when there's nothing confirmed as coming after it. ...my advice, dont hold your breath. Whatever / IF something comes next it won't be a Defender, but something more like a Ford Ranger I'd suggest. ...which will make your sold 'interim' vehicle even more valuable.

  3. #843
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Burra NSW
    Posts
    933
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Land Rover should have looked (and competed)at how mercedes made a comeback into the commercial ute(government market). They hit the ADF contract hard and won it, that gave mercedes a stepping stone into other government utilities. Vic CFA have ordered heaps of 4x4 and 6x6 fire units, (300 units?) and I know of other government rural fire agencies doing the same, as there is no other vehicle on the market other than the Iveco that can carry every thing required on a fire ground. I enquirer about buying a G wagen commercial ute but it's a minimum order of 20. Landrover have dropped the ball big time and should have been more proactive in developing and adapting the current defenders for these applications. I'm running 5 defender Utes at the moment but have a dmax and an amarok in the mix as a test because I can't buy defenders any more, and can't justify the stupid prices of any second hand ones..

  4. #844
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Perth, West Australia
    Posts
    717
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Summiitt View Post
    Land Rover should have looked (and competed)at how mercedes made a comeback into the commercial ute(government market). They hit the ADF contract hard and won it, that gave mercedes a stepping stone into other government utilities. Vic CFA have ordered heaps of 4x4 and 6x6 fire units, (300 units?) and I know of other government rural fire agencies doing the same, as there is no other vehicle on the market other than the Iveco that can carry every thing required on a fire ground. I enquirer about buying a G wagen commercial ute but it's a minimum order of 20. Landrover have dropped the ball big time and should have been more proactive in developing and adapting the current defenders for these applications. I'm running 5 defender Utes at the moment but have a dmax and an amarok in the mix as a test because I can't buy defenders any more, and can't justify the stupid prices of any second hand ones..
    Maybe we could do an AULRO group buy - 20 is not that many?

  5. #845
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Summiitt View Post
    Land Rover should have looked (and competed)at how mercedes made a comeback into the commercial ute(government market). They hit the ADF contract hard and won it, that gave mercedes a stepping stone into other government utilities. Vic CFA have ordered heaps of 4x4 and 6x6 fire units, (300 units?) and I know of other government rural fire agencies doing the same, as there is no other vehicle on the market other than the Iveco that can carry every thing required on a fire ground. I enquirer about buying a G wagen commercial ute but it's a minimum order of 20. Landrover have dropped the ball big time and should have been more proactive in developing and adapting the current defenders for these applications. I'm running 5 defender Utes at the moment but have a dmax and an amarok in the mix as a test because I can't buy defenders any more, and can't justify the stupid prices of any second hand ones..


    Do some more research!

    The ADF wanted a "one supplier provides all" and LR have no big fleet (Mogs, Trucks etc)..

    LR therefore had no chance.

  6. #846
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Burra NSW
    Posts
    933
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Agreed, starting price of $85k cab chassis which I thought was ok, given the price of the competition..

  7. #847
    MrLandy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Summiitt View Post
    Land Rover should have looked (and competed)at how mercedes made a comeback into the commercial ute(government market). They hit the ADF contract hard and won it, that gave mercedes a stepping stone into other government utilities. Vic CFA have ordered heaps of 4x4 and 6x6 fire units, (300 units?) and I know of other government rural fire agencies doing the same, as there is no other vehicle on the market other than the Iveco that can carry every thing required on a fire ground. I enquirer about buying a G wagen commercial ute but it's a minimum order of 20. Landrover have dropped the ball big time and should have been more proactive in developing and adapting the current defenders for these applications. I'm running 5 defender Utes at the moment but have a dmax and an amarok in the mix as a test because I can't buy defenders any more, and can't justify the stupid prices of any second hand ones..
    Great post Summitt. Totally agree. They had a choice but squandered it over decades. And they still have a choice, but they're squandering it on nostalgic nonsense and inaction.

  8. #848
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Burra NSW
    Posts
    933
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Do some more research!

    The ADF wanted a "one supplier provides all" and LR have no big fleet (Mogs, Trucks etc)..

    LR therefore had no chance.
    Tombie, landrover was in the box seat to push the defender regardless of winning another ADF contract, they should have had the gear and knowledge to enter in non ADF contracts, they weren't interested in progressing the defender..very simple

  9. #849
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Summiitt View Post
    Tombie, landrover was in the box seat to push the defender regardless of winning another ADF contract, they should have had the gear and knowledge to enter in non ADF contracts, they weren't interested in progressing the defender..very simple


    And why would they?

    Mine fleet not interested
    Commercial fleet not interested
    Logging fleet not interested

    It's an ergonomically wrong vehicle, it's got no chance of meeting ANCAP 4 let alone 5/6.
    It had no provision for airbags due to design restrictions and tooling to change would be nigh on impossible.

    You don't progress a 50+ year design, you put it to pasture and look for the next thing..

    **** me - the rose coloured glasses in here are amazing.

    I love my Land Rovers, but I haven't read such a ridiculous amount of BS in my life.
    The Defender is a Dinosaur in a digital age, much like it seems several in these threads.

    The Defender was the MOST expensive vehicle LR produced, has the lowest sales figures, and EU (a real market) pressure and laws said its time was up...

    So whether you ****ing like it or not, it was doomed.

    People who only look at Aussie markets have no idea how insignificant we really are...

  10. #850
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    And following on,the Aussie LR market is about 3% of the LR world market.

    So why would they listen to anyone here?

Page 85 of 105 FirstFirst ... 3575838485868795 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!