Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 68

Thread: Why no TDV6?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    There would be a market....if Land Rover actually modernized and marketed the Defender...
    Wait for 2015, there'll either be no Defenders or a more modern replacement.

    Much to the chargrin of the Defender faithfulls!

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    286
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well following the trend, the Defender will still get an underpowered powerplant. Freelander will get more horses and newtons..



    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Wait for 2015, there'll either be no Defenders or a more modern replacement.

    Much to the chargrin of the Defender faithfulls!

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by specwarop View Post
    An extra 20kw really isnt going to make the car unsafe. Some would argue it would make it safer.
    In addition, that extra 20kw would work towards moving arguably the heaviest car out of all those mentioned above, a bit easier - and resulting in better fuel economy despite the extra power and size of the engine.
    20kw?
    The TDV6 was 440Nm and 140kw.
    The current defender is 360Nm and 90kw: http://www.landrover.co.nz/i/files/s...fender_1.0.pdf

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    286
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Someone said 20kw more in the 3.2L Duratorq motor.
    But yeh that 50kw extra from the TDV6 is a big jump, but then again 140kw is bugger all, my Subaru has 40kw more than that again, and the car weighs half as much...

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Sydney
    Posts
    2,499
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's funny, if for once they put a motor in the Defender that wasn't a tiny, ****y piece of **** they might actually sell some, I know we'd have a new one here instead of a Navara.

    Just think of how many Isuzu 110's are on the road still, just because they have a decent motor, people actually take them seriously.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,576
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's not so much about the KW's, more about the NM's.

    With my current BAS tune and associated bits, my PUMA 2.4L is estimated to be putting out 120kw's and 450nm's. It makes the D'fer so so much nicer to drive, it just wants to go, there is no reluctancey to excellerate or maintain speed even with my camper on behind.

    Bottom line the Defender needs more power from what currently on offer.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    286
    Total Downloaded
    0
    How was your fuel economy effected, if at all, Drover?
    Was the $1000 to get the tune worthwhile?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,576
    Total Downloaded
    0
    To get the most out of the tune I have up graded the intercooler to AliSport, fitted Terra-Firma de-cat and centre muffler removal pipe and replaced the factory ducting to from the air box to the guard vent/snorkel with 90mm flexi tube.

    Fuel consumption is about 11L/100k's and can be up to 13.5L/100 towing the camper.

    Is it worth it - Yep

    Would I do it again - in a heart beat

    You cannot imagine how much more alive your defender can be !

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    286
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Would doing those mods, except the tune, be worthwhile on their own also?
    11L/100km is better than factory isnt it? Better than the advertised rates I see!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by specwarop View Post
    Would doing those mods, except the tune, be worthwhile on their own also?
    11L/100km is better than factory isnt it? Better than the advertised rates I see!
    Combined figures claimed are 10.2l/100 for the 90 and 11.1 for the 110.
    So those results aren't better than factory.

    But usage and kit-out of defenders varies so much that fuel economy readings from others may be of no use to you.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!