Thread: Puma power??

Isn't the 2.2 supposed to be more powerful than the 2.4? I don't find my bog-standard 2.4l 130 to be under-powered. I suppose it's a matter of what you want from it. If I'd wanted a racing car I wouldn't have bought a Defender. Being a small motor with a turbo, it doesn't have heaps of power straight off idle, but the 6-speed box means you can drive it in an RPM range that produces good power.

The
2.4 130is exactly what I want but havnt test drove one yet . What is your fuel range and consumption? Would u consider power chips etc any issues so far?
Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

I traded a 2.4 on a 2.2. Power output is nearly the same, but the 2.2 is much smoother.

By defender standards the 2.2 flies. But depending what you compare it to it will be under powered or over powered. It's all in the comparison.

The 2.2 feels nice to drive - and has sufficient power for just about any situation except perhaps drag racing. But then you'd buy a different car for that. The power is more than sufficient for off roading etc.

Originally Posted by squidsd1

The
2.4 130is exactly what I want but havnt test drove one yet . What is your fuel range and consumption? Would u consider power chips etc any issues so far?
Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

Fuel consumption is about 9 km per litre, was getting close to 10 but having the roof rack on has knocked it a bit. I think my Long-Ranger tank is 120 litre, but the warning light comes on at 95-100l, must drain it one day and see how much reserve i have. I'm happy with the power, have spent money on driveline upgrades (diif locks, axles & CVs, double-cardan front shaft), better spent than trying to make a racing car out of it IMO. Only issue I have had was check-engine lamp coming on frequently, haven't seen it since replacing the MAP sensor 13,000km ago.

I reckon the 2.2 is fine, I can keep up with the flow of traffic quite comfortably, can sit on 110 on the open road and it's geared really well for off-roading as well. What more could you want from a defender, I think it's great!

All defenders are underpowered for the size of the vehicle but I don't mind me 2.2 it is fairly nice to drive however the computer is a pain at times as it has a bad delay and holds revs at certain rpm's....the fuel economy on mine isn't to crash hot however I do have 285's,roof basket and a steel tray...I do not have a tune as of yet I do have a straight threw exhaust which made a tad of difference

I had my 09 Puma chipped by Bruce Davis in Sydney. Goes really well and gets good fuel consumption. 10k per liter most of the time. I have had better under ideal conditions.
As for performance I couldn't ask for more I am very pleased with it. 110-130 on the freeway is no problem and overtaking is no problem.
Before the chip remap it was pretty good, now it's very good

If you compare it to any 3 liter toyota or 3.2 liter Ford then it's got nothing on those 2 motors. But it's not underpowered for what it's meant for. I always wish I had more power but that doesn't mean I'm not happy with the 2.2. It just means I'm greedy.