Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 43

Thread: BFGoodrich KM2 high tyre wear + pressures?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perf, WA
    Posts
    653
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Summiitt View Post
    I decided to give a set of km2 a go on one of my 130s. I rotate and align every 10,000km, have tried all different pressures, but we will be lucky to get 45-50k out of them. Running along side a set of Mickey Ts MTZ on an almost identical if not heavier 130 puma ute and they are about half worn at 40k.
    The ute with BFGs is doing forestry work so fast tar, fast dirt and shale/ granite trails... The tyre dealer who runs these tyres on he's f350 and recommended them is at a loss to the high wear, but is pretty sure it's the fast/windy bitumen that is killing these tyres, both utes run close to the GVM..don't think I will be buying another set for the premium price.
    Interesting. If mine carry on giving high wear on the fronts (especially on inside edge) I'll be rotating them and flipping them on the rims also.

    Alignment check is being done now ...

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perf, WA
    Posts
    653
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Alignment done. Toe-in was off by -0.5deg and -1.0deg

    I asked if this was a lot and the tyre guy said "sh*tloads". I guess it must've been like that for a while. I also got asked if i'd been bashing the car around.

    "well, it is a Defender..."

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Samblers View Post
    Alignment done. Toe-in was off by -0.5deg and -1.0deg

    I asked if this was a lot and the tyre guy said "sh*tloads". I guess it must've been like that for a while. I also got asked if i'd been bashing the car around.

    "well, it is a Defender..."
    Defenders toe OUT, not in. (Spec is 0-2mm toe OUT, but those values do seem along way out)

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Samblers View Post
    Post up your tread depth measurement when you have done them

    Cheers
    Will do mate,

    I'm still searching for my tread depth gauge. I put it somewhere safe, so safe, I can't find it. I even went to Super Cheap to guy another but they are $7 and since I already have one somewhere, I figured it was a waste of money. I might just use a ruler.

    Happy Days

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perf, WA
    Posts
    653
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Defenders toe OUT, not in. (Spec is 0-2mm toe OUT, but those values do seem along way out)
    Umm, yeah, toe out, oops

    Guy said 15 minutes is about 1mm. So i guess 1 degree is waaay out.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's alright everyone. You can stop helping me look now. I found my tread depth gauge.

    So the undriven spare is a smidge over 14mm and 3 of the running tyres with just over 7,000km a smidge over 13mm. The 4th running tyre is on the passenger (left) side front and it's about right on 13mm (round abouts, in town).

    I know a couple have posted and guessed your tyre size at 235/85-16. Can you confirm as different tyre sizes of the same brand and model vary greatly in construction. Just an example, 31.5x10.5R15 are 6 ply where the 245x75R16 that I have are 10 ply. The higher ply rating means less tread flex, this means less heat and therefore longer mileage. The lower ply ratings are however on the wider tyres which means for the same weight they have a wider foot print compared to a narrower tyre that has a longer foot print for the same weight. So as the wider tyre has a shorter foot print, this means less tread flex, less heat and therefore longer life. It's very hard to make head or tails of peoples comments on tyres and tyre life for particular brands without considering tyre sizes. For example the standard Disco 2 tyre size is 235X70R16 (6 ply) but many fit 245x75R16 (10ply). If you were to compare tyre life the 245x75R16 should greatly outlast the standard tyre. Its wider, larger diameter and higher ply rating every point that reduces tread flex which reduces heat and extends life. If some one was to replace a standard size tyre and change brands at the same time the later tyre would look ridiculousness better but be a product of the dimensions rather than the brand or model of tyre.




  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Further to Joel's post, tyre sizes can vary batch to batch, let alone between makes.
    Just because a tyre has 235/85-16 on the sidewall doesn't automatically mean it measures up at that.

    In another lifetime when I raced, the Dunlop race tyre blokes would run the stagger tape around the tyres and match them in pairs, they varied so much in circumference/diameter. IIRC in some cases by more than 1/2" and these came out of the same factory and were ostensibly the same tyre !
    When running on an open wheeler that's huge.

    These were English Dunlops (and IMO were ****) the Japanese factories are much more consistent, but they do vary.
    One of the Japanese Bridgestone engineers reckoned one of the hardest things in the world was to make a tyre round too !

    [edit] FWIW I've measured two sets of Maxxis 762 Big Horns in 255/85-16 and they all measured damned close to 33.3" diameter when running the tape around the circumference at IIRC around 20-25psi, which is bloody consistent.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perf, WA
    Posts
    653
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by joel0407 View Post
    So the undriven spare is a smidge over 14mm and 3 of the running tyres with just over 7,000km a smidge over 13mm. The 4th running tyre is on the passenger (left) side front and it's about right on 13mm (round abouts, in town).
    Given my measurement on the fronts for the same mileage (down to 9mm) i'd say youre doing good.

    For ref, my tyres are 265/75/16

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    BFG tyres tend to be smaller than advertised - my 315/75R16 are quite a bit smaller than advertised - supposed to be about 35" in the old size but in reality are about 34".

    Garry
    Last edited by 101RRS; 1st May 2014 at 03:12 PM. Reason: Tyre size is 315/75R16 not 315/70R16
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    BFG tyres tend to be smaller than advertised - my 315/70R16 are quite a bit smaller than advertised - supposed to be about 35" in the old size but in reality are about 34".

    Garry
    I have to totally disagree with you there mate,

    It's pretty common knowledge that 245x75R16 will fit on the rear carrier of the Disco with out flipping the carrier but BFG KM2 in that size, won't fit without the flip.

    Tyre width is another thing though. Manufactures seem to be a bit of a rule of their own. I don't think I have ever measured a tyre that was exactly what the tyre size. I dont really know what its supposed to mean. Is it the tread width that may extend to the side wall of the tyre. That would flatten out when defelated. Is it tyre width at the maximum buldge of the side wall which could vary greatly with pressure.

    And this Tire Size Converter says your tyres are only 33.4 inches.

    It's calculated like this, 70 series is 70% of the width in side wall height so 70% x 315mm = 220.5. You have a side wall on the top and bottom so 2 x 220.5 = 441mm of side wall. Plus the rim of 16 inches which is 406.4mm. So 441mm (side walls) + 406.4mm (Rim) = 847.4mm or 33.36 inches.

    Happy Days.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!