Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 44 of 44

Thread: 2012 Defender puma 2.2 fuel consumption 13.5l/100??

  1. #41
    DiscoMick Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lagerfan View Post
    I think the MTRs are definitely the cause of some of the pain. By my guesstimate they add about 1l/100km, maybe more. I have a very light foot and yet can only get 10.5l/100km out of our 90 on average. Will try the Conti ATs next time around.


    A relation put some Mickey Thompsons (not sure which ones) on his 80 series and reckons the fuel consumption increased by about 2 l/100kms. He's not happy.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Chidlow WA
    Posts
    107
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I recently put Mickey Thompson's on my 90', and at first my fuel consumption was up by 1 L/100Km. But since playing with the pressures to even the wear pattern, and then going the other way for handling (during emergency breaking etc), I have found that I am using less fuel now. If you don't operate at the correct pressure for that particular tyre, on that make/model of vehicle (plus mods), then you are not going to get the best performance.

    But in general, wider tyres do require more power to use.


    Cheers,

    Phill.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    577
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Going from skinny to fats can increase fuel burn by upto 15% on my defender
    . Road tyre to a/t or m/t

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,757
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In my 2013 d90 my best was 10l/100km. Normal is around the 10.5 ish... Towing increases depending on load. Worst I've gotten was about 18l/100km.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!