The answers to all your questions where that Ford wouldn't let them. It didn't fit in with their world view. If you look at them from Ford's point of view they weren't stupid decisions, just ones we didn't like.
Besides they didn't exactly cover themselves in glory with their last defence contract.
Cheers,
Jon
Sure, but problem is that Ford haven't built a vehicle that matches the above applications either. No one has, except apparently Mercedes G Wagon, Defenders benchmark. Though I can't see many G wagons on mine sites or in paddocks.
Funny how you can track the ship online but not steer it. 🙃
Its been said, that if the tooling goes to India, then they well be a large military land rover contract.
Would also be stupid not to continue selling to all those markets in the world that don't give a toss about Euro 6/7/8 etc.
So no hope of them ever coming back here.
Ford would argue they have the F trucks, which apparently do pretty well in the US. Unfortunately we live in that minor market known as the rest of the world.
The G wagen is a good example. Small volume, niche manufacturer and way too expensive to be used for what its designed for, except by the military.
As for Defence contracts, LRs last contract (the UK Wolfs) was a disaster. Ford didn't want to know about that market and stopped LR bidding on the Perentie replacements.
I don't think Ford cared too much about LR, or PAG, despite investing heavily to develop the Disco 3. PAG was Jac Nasser's baby - look how quickly they got rid of it when they gave him the flick. Anyway Ford have gone now so they can get back to building real Land Rovers.
Unfortunately what I think you want the new Defender to be ignores the commercial reality. Sales of traditional Land Rovers have been dwindling since the '80s. Even in their biggest market, British farmers, they've been losing sales to Japanese utes as people have been willing to trade load carrying ability and strength for more creature comforts. Even the mining market is going this way. Add to this the increasingly restrictive regulations in LR's major markets and we'll never see a vehicle like the current Defender again.
For the new Defender to be sucessful it will need to have much broader market appeal than the current model. I think the markets you have identified are important, but it cannot ignore the recreational market either.
Cheers,
Jon
F Trucks are stupid, big and ugly, which is why they don't sell any volume in 'the rest of the world'. Although the ford ranger is heading that way.
Otherwise some good points John. I'm enjoying your perspective.
And if you're right re Defender, I rest my case. Defender is finished.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks