Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: What would you buy?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by timax View Post
    I have a 2001 TD5 and it has traction control and ABS.
    6 speed in the Puma will see you changing gear too often if your in the city. Heavy clutch can be fixed by a booster. The interior is much nicer than the earlier cars also.
    Gear changes are not all that different between Tdi 5 and Puma 6 IMO. 1st in Puma is marginally shorter. ...6th is an overdrive really, I never use it under 100km/hr.
    Puma is definitely more relaxed on a long journey that a 5 speed.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    5,778
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I test drove a Puma in 2014 when looking to upgrade my Perentie wagon. The only thing to impress me was the interior incl the AC. The 6 speed annoyed me, especially for city driving. I thought the power was under whelming.
    I also drove a late td5. Interior not as good, a bit more noisy, I didn’t feel a big power difference between the two. It was a lot better value at the time.
    I didn’t consider either worth the money for an “upgrade”. Clearly plenty of others rate both.
    If I had to pick from you’re options I would go no 2 and see how you like it. Upgrade later if you wanted to.
    L322 tdv8 poverty pack - wow
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 49-107 (probably selling) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc.
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 48-699 another project
    Track Trailer ARN 200-117
    REMLR # 137

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toowoomba, Queensland
    Posts
    1,863
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Everyone has their own equation. I preferred to get the oldest car that would do the job: I worry less about damage and even less about repairs. I "repaired" the rear lights with cheap trailer lights, happily ignore the cargo area leaking in heavy rain. The bullbar is rusty (so I know its steel). Its a diesel with working AC: a 1992 200TDi Defender. I've probably got another 5 years before it needs the engine rebuilt, and I should probably get the paint redone some time...

    The price I pay is slower towing and louder talking. It's worth every cent ... I save. Thats before fuel bills: better fuel economy than the Pumas!

    FWIW its the newest Landie I've owned but far from the only. A V8 Series III and a V8 County before it, then a short diversion to a Pajero before returning to the one true 4WD religion (cough).
    Steve

    2003 Discovery 2a
    In better care:
    1992 Defender
    1963 Series IIa Ambulance
    1977 Series III Ex-Army
    1988 County V8
    1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
    REMLR No. 215

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    36
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Great input

    Lots of very good ideas to mull over indeed.

    Thanks all for input, experience says a heap for sure.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,842
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Our Puma cruises along nicely at 60kph in the suburbs, of course if that speed is not constant then 4th & and 5th come into play, but on long distance work the 6th gear is simply superb, a major plus for the Puma IMHO, plus of course ya've got a reasonable A.C. system.
    Pickles.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Puma cruising speed gear ratios IMO.
    3rd at 50
    4th at 60
    5th at 80
    6th 100kmhr +
    Perfect.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    36
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thoughts on this rig

    What are thoughts on this rig as an option 1? Seems to have had heaps of stuff done to it, lots of the stuff I read is good, like ecu upgrade, Salisbury diff, etc etc.

    What would be main concern here?

    We've taken a wrong turn

    Or this for option 2? Far less options upgraded but looks good solid original unit. Would I need to spend on remap, diff, etc?

    We've taken a wrong turn

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Nsw
    Posts
    1
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Option 3

    Go option 3 for 5 yrs my 98' tdi 130 has been fun and capable but noisy uncomfortable and not safe but requires constant work and ebay gets a thrashing for spares

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    220
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Another option

    Buy a flogged out 130 TDI, strip it down, rebuild it.

    During the rebuild you could address a lot of the "issues" TDi`s have.

    Interior could be fitted with sound deadner, Puma seats etc.

    Engine could be upgraded, the new Cummins 2.8 looks like a good option, Isuzu and Cummins 6bt are other options.

    Even could Auto if that takes your fancy

    Diffs could be upgraded

    Transfer case could be strengthed,


    Some very rough sums are

    Vehicle 10k

    Interior 5k Puma Seats, insulation etc etc

    Rust Repairs, Paint 8k

    Engine and driveline 10k maybe more depend on option, could be double.


    So lets say for roughly 40k you could have a Landrover that will do 10 years plus. Will have the creature comforts you want, you will have a rebuilt driveline.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ocean Reef WA
    Posts
    3,098
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Or you could buy my 110 instead which has had virtually all necessary done to make it ultra reliable. Anything extra done would be purely for your own particular needs.
    Plus it's 5K less than the above scenario of buying and doing up.
    Just a thought....
    AlanH.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!