Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Steering Drop Arm Conversion

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Dubbo
    Posts
    545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Right, gotcha. Just found the Maxidrive stuff on MR's website. Thanks for that

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Greatest city in Australia, Darwin!
    Posts
    483
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm sure the maxidrive steering dampener brackets are great, but does anyone know if the disco steering arm is superior to the defender one?

    I've been contemplating the Gwynn Lewis kit too, it appeals to my spatial reasoning and looks to be a superior arrangement.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,028
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It just make servicing easier. There is no change in the steering. It is simply changing to a normal Disco 1 or RRC front pitman and drag link.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The only thing I thought may have made a difference is the goose neck on the end of the drag link MAY want to "roll" about as its not being pushed in a direct line, if that makes sense. Obviously it cant move far and probably gets in a set position....

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Dubbo
    Posts
    545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think the stiffer drag link is supposed to make the main difference. But I doubt it'd make any difference unless you've enormous tyres or a very heavy front end.
    Like Red90 said, the drop arm change just makes replacing the ball joint a whole lot easier from what I can see.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Ipswich, QLD
    Posts
    27
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is just standard discovery eqipment.
    The biggest gain i reckon is servicability of the ball joint as it is no longer on the pitman arm.

    Seemed to always be chewing out the boot on the old pitman arm because the steering damper induced a twisting action to the steering arm so as to pinch the boot.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Colin View Post
    It is just standard discovery eqipment.
    The biggest gain i reckon is servicability of the ball joint as it is no longer on the pitman arm.

    Seemed to always be chewing out the boot on the old pitman arm because the steering damper induced a twisting action to the steering arm so as to pinch the boot.
    I am on my third pitman arm ball joint, the first one (original) lasted 7.5 yrs, I got it replaced a year ago and it is gone again, I need new track rod ends also, so instead of replacing I am doing the conversion, that way if it goes again I just replace an end on the rod.

    Going with the Terafirma TF255 bars for the disco 2, and I have bought an arm for the disco also, not going to do this one myself as I have heard getting the steering arm off is a nightmare. But once done serviceing should be a doddle if it goes again.

    If there is an improvement to the steering then thats a bonus, but at least I will have HD rods now.

    I will let you know :-)

  8. #18
    jbe's Avatar
    jbe is offline Master Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Yass
    Posts
    249
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm looking into the same conversion at the moment. GL just told me that they were not willing to deduct the VAT from their sales price and I also don't overly like the steering damper bracket design. Therefore, I will go ahead with the MD track rod and bracket.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!