Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: ultra reliable Defa

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Geedublya View Post
    It's one of the Defender crew bragging about how the Defender is much more reliable because it is so simple (again).
    Well yes i can understand that... i mean hell, we all know it right????

    But dirty talk about new Range Rover models is just sullying this part of the forum
    Regards
    Daz


  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melrose SA
    Posts
    2,838
    Total Downloaded
    0

    ultra reliable Defa

    Is the thread about the ultra reliable Puma?
    Mmm
    Not sure Digger would agree with that

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I reckon the OP was just trying to be funny comparing to his Defender, but it doesn’t make any sense. The thread probably needs a new title and should be in general chat.

    It’s good to see a vehicle manufacturer properly held to account for a faulty vehicle.

    Somehow vehicle faults are in a category of their own. Most other faulty products would simply be returned for a new replacement within the warranty period. Repairs are obviously more realistic on such a complex and expensive product, but surely there should be a two or three strikes rule and a replacement provided if a vehicle continues to have faults.

    Defenders then wouldnt need driveline upgrades, etc because some pressure would be back on the manufacturer to modify the design.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by djam1 View Post
    Is the thread about the ultra reliable Puma?
    Mmm
    Not sure Digger would agree with that
    Like with a lot of Land Rover models, its a perspective thing....
    If there are say a handful of faults with the Defender TDCi (puma, 2007 on), then the model before had 50 million faults.
    The Defender / 110 has always been a hodge bodge of a vehicle. As new transmissions, engines etc etc became available, they were shoe horned into the existing vehicle with the very minimal of changes.

    The biggest thing that ****s me with the last Defender TDCi model was some items that were the same as the previous model and rarely gave problems have suddenly become an issue with the TDCi. Two steps forward one step backwards.....

    The best part about a Defender / 110 is sitting there looking at it, the next is driving it..... the worst part is working on them.
    Regards
    Daz


  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeros View Post
    I reckon the OP was just trying to be funny comparing to his Defender, but it doesn’t make any sense. The thread probably needs a new title and should be in general chat.

    It’s good to see a vehicle manufacturer properly held to account for a faulty vehicle.

    Somehow vehicle faults are in a category of their own. Most other faulty products would simply be returned for a new replacement within the warranty period.
    Well yes that is the law and its only new car manufacturers and their lobby group that seem to think consumer warranty is only for fridges and washing machines etc.
    The ACCC does seem to be moving on these manufacturers with the latest being VW with a court in forced order on money back for any owner having major engine issues with their VW diesel car.
    Regards
    Daz


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!