Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Defender 110 front diff pinion angle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    Defender 110 front diff pinion angle

    In the process of having new driveshafts made for my 6x6 project. What has me scratching my head is the front diff pinion flange angle.

    Sitting on the ground with engine transmission installed, the rear transmission-diff flange angles are all parallel (vertical). When measuring the front the LT230 output shaft has the same angle as the rear assemblies, but the diff flange angle has a 17 degree difference.

    I am assuming this shaft will need a Double Cardan joint but is 17 degree too great. (Do standard Defender front diffs have a non vertical flange?)

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No, they don't, at least on the pre-Defender 110, and I think on all Defenders as well. What they have is the front and rear universals on the front prop shaft at different phases, from memory, about two splines on the sliding joint (the shafts are marked on both sides of the spline joint), which is considered to sufficiently reduce the vibration.

    Worth noting that the RR Classic, Disco 1, with basically the same power train and suspension, do have a double Cardan joint at the TC end. And in my view, that would be the way I would go in your case.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wannanup WA
    Posts
    1,642
    Total Downloaded
    4.70 MB
    Worth noting that the RR Classic, Disco 1, with basically the same power train and suspension, do have a double Cardan joint at the TC end.
    Arh, I don't think so? I have previously owned both of them, although a while ago, I don't recall seeing those, not unless they have been raised on the suspensions.

  4. #4
    TonyC is offline Wizard Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NE Victoria
    Posts
    1,413
    Total Downloaded
    32.83 MB
    Neither of the D1s if played with have double cardon drive shafts.

    I believe D2s have a DC joint at one end of the front shaft.

    Tony

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Universe A
    Posts
    2,645
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The D2 is the only one I know of that uses a double cardan, the others are single cardan at both ends.

    A pretty nice and quite popular upgrade for a defender is swapping over to the D2 one, it would likely also work on the above mentioned vehicles.

    I think you gain a little bit more theoretical drive angle when needed and a smoother drive line as a cardan joint is not CV. A double cardan is also not a true CV but it nearly is.

    I'd go the double.

    The flange on the TC is different between single and double cardan and needs to be swapped if swapping drive shafts.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Defenders, D1 and so far as I know the rangie classics all have about the same pitch up on the front diff, To aid in dive line vibration reduction the UJ's are offset (from memory) one spline if you have the coarse spline slip joints (factory) or 3 splines if you have one of the aftermarket propshafts with the fine spline slip joint.

    Some D1s and rangies also have a harmonic counter weight bolted to the diff where the defenders can have the tie rod catch plate installed.

    Late defender top option packs like the td4 tombraiders and the extremes have the DC as well.

    All perenties run a standard UJ, I have a customer who wanted the shaft remade with the wide angle flanges and UJ's so far the only real benefit I've seen to the mod is its so much easier to get onto the heads of the fixings.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    Defenders, D1 and so far as I know the rangie classics all have about the same pitch up on the front diff, To aid in dive line vibration reduction the UJ's are offset (from memory) one spline if you have the coarse spline slip joints (factory) or 3 splines if you have one of the aftermarket propshafts with the fine spline slip joint.

    Some D1s and rangies also have a harmonic counter weight bolted to the diff where the defenders can have the tie rod catch plate installed.

    Late defender top option packs like the td4 tombraiders and the extremes have the DC as well.

    All perenties run a standard UJ, I have a customer who wanted the shaft remade with the wide angle flanges and UJ's so far the only real benefit I've seen to the mod is its so much easier to get onto the heads of the fixings.
    This Defender has the tie rod catch plate you mention, but the 17 degree up angle on the pinion angle seems unusual to me.

    I know that on my '85 classic when it when it went to 4.6 and ZF needed the shaft rotated 1 spline to solve a severe vibration at 80km.

    Thought I'd use Hardy-Spicer in Moorebank to make shafts, but any other recommendations for a vendor?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    This Defender has the tie rod catch plate you mention, but the 17 degree up angle on the pinion angle seems unusual to me.

    I know that on my '85 classic when it when it went to 4.6 and ZF needed the shaft rotated 1 spline to solve a severe vibration at 80km.

    Thought I'd use Hardy-Spicer in Moorebank to make shafts, but any other recommendations for a vendor?

    not up your way, I use melbourne driveshafts exclusively when in melbourne.

    I have been meaning to have a discussion with them about converting a front shaft to a pair of CV's on modified flanges to see how that goes.

    As I recall all the fronts axles on coiled beam axles are tilted up pretty sure in a fireplace discussion about it it was to do with both the clearance for the tie rod (which used to be in front for the leafers) and reducing the running angle of the UJ's on the front end.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  9. #9
    350RRC's Avatar
    350RRC is offline ForumSage Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    5,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    ..............

    Sitting on the ground with engine transmission installed, the rear transmission-diff flange angles are all parallel (vertical). When measuring the front the LT230 output shaft has the same angle as the rear assemblies, but the diff flange angle has a 17 degree difference.

    ...............
    If what you mean is that the snout of the diff is pointing too much towards the ground be aware that the fitting of caster correction bushes will cause similar.

    DL

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by 350RRC View Post
    If what you mean is that the snout of the diff is pointing too much towards the ground be aware that the fitting of caster correction bushes will cause similar.

    DL
    Not sure the caster would have been modified, the vehicle was an import, never registered purchased at auction from a UK Government entity.

    What I mean with the pinion angle, the the pinion flange is pointing up towards the transmission output. The diff flange around 17 degrees from horizontal the transmission output horizontal.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!