Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 78

Thread: Who has 285 tyres on there Defender?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rar110 View Post
    Qld Transport website says re the standard size "the overall diameter of the tyre must not vary by more than +15mm or -26mm."

    According to a Maxxis brochure I have the overall diameter of their Big Horn 235/85 is 806mm, the 285/75 is 834mm, and 255/85 is 845mm.

    However, I understand there are several ways to measure overall diameter.
    I am pretty sure the diameter of the michelin XZL (optional/original fitment on 110s/130s) is about 820-830 mm or so.

    My IIA has 285-75s and it has gone through several inspections (RWC/transport/police) at various times in 2 different states and nothing has been mentioned. I don't know of anyone who has had (legal) issues having 33's on a series/110.

    If and when the NCOP comes in, the rule will increase to +50mm for 4x4s.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    5,778
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    I am pretty sure the diameter of the michelin XZL (optional/original fitment on 110s/130s) is about 820-830 mm or so.

    My IIA has 285-75s and it has gone through several inspections (RWC/transport/police) at various times in 2 different states and nothing has been mentioned. I don't know of anyone who has had (legal) issues having 33's on a series/110.

    If and when the NCOP comes in, the rule will increase to +50mm for 4x4s.
    I measured Col Coleman's XZL's one day and they were shorter than my Faulken AT 235/85's.

    You are right - you would be dead unlucky to get pinged for having 33s on a series/110.

    The change would reflect reality a bit more than the current rules.
    L322 tdv8 poverty pack - wow
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 49-107 (probably selling) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc.
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 48-699 another project
    Track Trailer ARN 200-117
    REMLR # 137

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah, but remember that the size variation is from the biggest tyre that the manufacturer chart recomends, not the tyre neccessaarily fitted to the car now or as standard.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigE View Post
    Yeah, but remember that the size variation is from the biggest tyre that the manufacturer chart recomends, not the tyre neccessaarily fitted to the car now or as standard.
    And where do you get that size from??? The mathematical size is not the actual size. The "Tyre and Rim Standards Association" publish a manual of standard sizes, however there is a standard for road and offroad - so which one do you pick for a landie???

    I have asked similar questions to QLD transport and received vague answers - which I suspect is the reason that the powers that be aren't keen on hassling anyone who is just over the 15 mm rule.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,127
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    I'm pretty sure it's based on the nominal sizes listed on the placard though some push for sizes used by the manufacturer on that model but not necessarily on that placard (ie specials).
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Christchurch NZ
    Posts
    1,164
    Total Downloaded
    0
    285/75/16's as standard ROCKCRAWLER.com - SEMA Show 2003 - Land Rover Defender 110 CKD

    order your kit now.....................
    1995 Defender 110 300TDI :D
    1954 86" Series 1 Automatic :eek:
    Ex '66 109" flat deck, '82 109" 3 door, '89 110 CSW V8, '74 Range Rover, '66 88" soft top, '78 88" soft top, '95 Disco ES V8, '88 Surf, '90 Surf, '84 V8 Surf, '91 Vitara.

  7. #57
    mcrover Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jimbo110 View Post
    285/75/16's as standard ROCKCRAWLER.com - SEMA Show 2003 - Land Rover Defender 110 CKD

    order your kit now.....................
    That could be how LR can continue building the Deefa......as a home built kit

    Yep well there you have it, factory fitted 285 75x16's.

    I think they look good but Im not convinced in normal 4wding that tyres that big are all that nessesary but if you get a bit more serious into it then yes you need them.

    There is a heap of contradictory data in this thread re fat vs skinny and I think in the end it comes down to what you use your 4wd for and where you want to get.

    If you want them just for the look then I dont think it is the best thing to do as they do effect stopping distances, control and acceleration as well as economy but again thats just my opinion.

    I run 235 85 16 on my Disco, I would probably go a bit bigger if I ran flares but i wouldnt really go over 265 75 16 Silverstones.

    I think 33's are pretty acceptable though, 35's Simex's look great but are too big and as they are designed as truck tyres and in reality they over tyre a LR (as the compund and construction is designed for a 6 to 8 tonne truck not 2 to 3 tonnes of 4wd) drive terrible on any surface other than Mud and the others Ive had no experience with so I wont comment.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i agree with that, even though i have 285's. they look good and they take me where i want to go and are cheapish compaired to other brands. ive run LRH's JT2's on the 90 and they are horrible on road and in reality i dont think that the differance between the 33's im running and the 35's of his really make any differance to where i go. different story if it was a comp truck.

    cheers phil

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,127
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by mcrover View Post
    I think 33's are pretty acceptable though, 35's Simex's look great but are too big and as they are designed as truck tyres and in reality they over tyre a LR (as the compund and construction is designed for a 6 to 8 tonne truck not 2 to 3 tonnes of 4wd) drive terrible on any surface other than Mud and the others Ive had no experience with so I wont comment.


    Why do you say that?

    None of the Simex's are load rated for a vehicle that heavy. They're almost all very plain in the load rating for a 4WD tyre. The size range are also very much 4WD sizings.

    Here are the ratings:
    Dynamic 4x4, Simex 4x4, Sime 4x4, General tire, Dynamic Wheels, Sime, Grabber, Extreme Trekker, Wheels
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    And where do you get that size from??? The mathematical size is not the actual size. The "Tyre and Rim Standards Association" publish a manual of standard sizes, however there is a standard for road and offroad - so which one do you pick for a landie???

    I have asked similar questions to QLD transport and received vague answers - which I suspect is the reason that the powers that be aren't keen on hassling anyone who is just over the 15 mm rule.
    Speaking to WA RTA a while back if you go over the margin allowed (-25mm +15mm I think) on the placard affixed to your vehicle you can be booked and an unroadworthy sticker placed on your car and depending on the copper can be a red one (here in WA) if they want as the vehicle is deemed to be unsafe to drive.
    The standards have absolutely nothing to do with a particular vehicle. It is a guide for manufacturers and once the manufacturers recomendations are placed on a vehicle these must be abided by without an engineering exemption.
    There are some real grey areas in this issue. Technically you can be booked for anything other than manufacturers reccomendations.
    It would be rare to get booked for having slightly larger tyres on a 4x4, however I have seen it done and a canary placed on the car.
    I know with Holden Commodores / Statesmans depending on what year you buy say 1995-2006 the placards vary. Earlier models only list 16" wheels and tyres while later models list 16-17" or 16, 17, 18". Now they are all very similar, but try buying a set of new mags in 16" to suit a late model Holden. Generally all you can get is 17-18". I know as we have been looking.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!