Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: defender 130 purchase??? used vs new

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've got a Td5 130 and a Puma 110, so can offer a direct comparison. Both of mine are bog standard, apart from a straight through pipe (i.e.no muffler) on the TD5.

    Both excellent engines I reckon. Longevity of the puma is of course unknown but being based on a "white-van" Transit engine would expect it to go a good distance. TD5 is better on fuel.

    The Puma engined car is SO much quiter at 110 than the TD5, but that is due to the 6 speed gearbox and the heap of extra soundproofing they put in the newer model. Dash looks more civilised on the new model but I really miss the flow through ventilation from the front flaps on the TD5.

    I'm hoping that the engine ECU tweaks currently available for the TD5 will eventually turn up for the Puma. As DullBird said - they will get here in a while.

    There seem to be a few (BIG) problems here and there posted on the Aust & UK LR sites but to date I have been lucky and had a good run since taking delivery 9 months ago.

    Good luck making your decision!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I forgot to mention...

    Im tipping big red to 500K Km prior to a total engine rebuild/replace
    Clutches will probabley be 150K Kmish or so along with engine mounts
    Gearboxes every 250K Km
    Uj's every 100K Km propshafts every 200K Km
    No diffs unless I go a locker Ditto axles

    I'll probabley let her go at about the second clutch. how do I know this...

    Its about all I ever get out of a vehicle But most of my replacements are precautionaries.


    While I have no doubt that they will be able to push the transit donk out past the td5's total output having seen the remnants of a grenaded transit donk I dont think it has the structural strength to deal with massive upgrades but then I didnt think I could keep the TD5 together with the chip its got in it now... (and Im still waiting for the budget for the new exhauast, turbo and the intercooler)
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by spudboy View Post
    I've got a Td5 130 and a Puma 110, so can offer a direct comparison. Both of mine are bog standard, apart from a straight through pipe (i.e.no muffler) on the TD5.

    Both excellent engines I reckon. Longevity of the puma is of course unknown but being based on a "white-van" Transit engine would expect it to go a good distance.
    TD5 is better on fuel.
    The Puma engined car is SO much quiter at 110 than the TD5, but that is due to the 6 speed gearbox and the heap of extra soundproofing they put in the newer model. Dash looks more civilised on the new model but I really miss the flow through ventilation from the front flaps on the TD5.

    I'm hoping that the engine ECU tweaks currently available for the TD5 will eventually turn up for the Puma. As DullBird said - they will get here in a while.

    There seem to be a few (BIG) problems here and there posted on the Aust & UK LR sites but to date I have been lucky and had a good run since taking delivery 9 months ago.

    Good luck making your decision!

    what you getting out of them both?

    i'm supprised with the new having the 6th gear

    also i heard that in the uk people are now reporting good fuel economy from there pumas BUT that because they have a fair few thousand miles on them now, apparently you wont get good economy from the new's until the engine has been well run in, apparently everything is to tight

    i asked ian and he said it was about 20,000k to 30,000k to losen them up.....(not sure where he got those figures though)
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    TD5 I'm doing about 9.5L/100

    Puma I'm doing 10.5L/100

    Similar driving conditions, up and down the Adelaide Hills, with not much stop start traffic work at all. I don't get into 6th all that often in the 110 as it is mostly 80Km/h limits around here.

    I have heard that the diesels get better consumption with age, so I am hoping it is true.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Newcastle,NSW
    Posts
    62
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Isuzudriver...or others......what is the upgrade cost of the Salisbury diff....is it really worth it?

    Blknight.Aus "I reckon that'll change but I dont know how much extra meat is in the engine to deal with it.".......if you have a look at the following website the UK are already doing it....upto 134kw and 450NM of torque....pretty impressive.....but not sure about fuel consumption with these chips in hphttp://www.jeengineering.co.uk/d_diesel_eng.htm ....did you have you 110 TD5 standard new or did you buy secondhand chipped???? fuel consumption differences??

    Xavie.....I see you have recently sold your 110 which was reasonably well decked out...what were the costs of the accessories.....judging by your comment "cheap" they're not too exxy??

    Keep the info coming guys.

    Cheers

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,455
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by spudboy View Post
    TD5 I'm doing about 9.5L/100

    Puma I'm doing 10.5L/100


    I have heard that the diesels get better consumption with age, so I am hoping it is true.

    hmmm.... I was generally getting good but loaded with a trailer OR stop start dirt roads I was getting up to 17.5 litres per 100.

    Xav

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Xavie View Post
    hmmm.... I was generally getting good but loaded with a trailer OR stop start dirt roads I was getting up to 17.5 litres per 100.

    Xav
    but you only owned your car for 5mins...hardly a run in eingine
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney, Northern Beaches
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stace70 View Post
    Isuzudriver...or others......what is the upgrade cost of the Salisbury diff....is it really worth it?
    No ... not worth it at all .. some people are stuck on Isuzu engines and Salisbury Diffs. Clearance is better on the rover diffs.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,445
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Greylandy View Post
    No ... not worth it at all .. some people are stuck on Isuzu engines and Salisbury Diffs. Clearance is better on the rover diffs.
    I'm with Henry.

    If and when it breaks look at the options with regards to a stronger unit in a rover casing.

    If you dont have larger wheels/tyres and you don't do heroic driving then let things take their course.
    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stace70 View Post
    Isuzudriver...or others......what is the upgrade cost of the Salisbury diff....is it really worth it?
    You could probably pick up a complete salisbury (disc-disc) and a propshaft for $1k or less.

    Some people are happy with the itsy bitsy rover diff in the rear, and you could wait till it breaks. But as I said - if it was mine... There is absolutely no chance I would go anywhere near a remote area with a rover-rear-diffed-130.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!