 Master
					
					
						Master
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Agreed.I have experienced this first hand and agree that the tune is the issue.
As Dougal said.
Reduce fuel, or
Intercool more effeciently, or
Increase Boost, or
Lean off of throttle, or
Change Gears.
I prefer options 1, 2, and 3. I do not like 'user input' to control the EGT's as it makes me really nervous when my wife drives and doesn't comprehend EGT's above 650DegC and the damage that can occur.
Or use a combination. WI is not the fix-all I had hoped. It is however a damn good fuel economy booster, and fantastic at decreasing the block (coolant) temps
Cheers, Adam.
 Master
					
					
						Master
					
					
                                        
					
					
						 ForumSage
					
					
						ForumSage
					
					
                                        
					
					
						 Master
					
					
						Master
					
					
                                        
					
					
						What do you mean by calculating the energy content of the methanol?
When acounting the price difference, I can use this scenario;
With the extra 200kg's of liquid, and the 400kg of equipment for our camper trailer (Yes I was very (Borderline) close to GVM), fuel economy (FE) with WI was 14.5L/100km[FE] with acceptable block temps and EGT's, (I was in a hurry). Without WI (Coober Pedy to Pt Augusta) fuel consumption was just under17L/100km.
With WI
Therefore I did 2200 @ 14.5FE.
14.5FE equates to $23/100km (1.63/L)
2200km @ $23/100km equals a total cost of $506 (plus $60 for meth)
Without WI
600 @ 17FE
17FE equates to $28/100km (1.63/L)
600km @ $28/100km equals a total cost of $166
Therefore cost per 100km-
With WI = $25.7
Without WI = $27.6
So noting I just did 11,500km's in our 4 week trip, I potentially could have saved $218.
Sadly my consumption rate is unsustainable. My intake manifold and intercooler is clean though!!
Cheers, Davo.
 ForumSage
					
					
						ForumSage
					
					
                                        
					
					
						 AT REST
					
					
						AT RESTAtomising the water..... just drip feed it onto a Hiclone, the swirling action of the hiclone will do the work.......
PS. this was intended as a sarcastic remark, often people read things on AULRO and take it as a positive fact.
I would not inject ANYTHING except gasses pre turbo on the compressor side. The blades spinning at 100,000+rpm will be damaged by droplets (even misting droplets) of fluid just as if you had been feeding sand into it
(This wasn't in response to the Hiclone comment Mario because I realised you are 'avin a larf,, just to an earlier post about preturbo nozzle placement
)
JC
The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						I have injected well over a thousand litres of water/meth through my turbo at 2gph over the past 18 months, its still as good as the day it was fitted, just make sure you use top quality nozzles, high injection pressure and have a check valve/solenoid as close to the nozzle as you can. The benefits far outweigh the negatives if done properly.
 Master
					
					
						Master
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Mmm, I stand corrected. It goes against everything I 'know' about high speed objects (Turbocharger compressor blades) hitting a 'solid' as water is deemed to be in a whole 'droplet' form, but I guess water / metho and proper misting nozzles and not just water droplets are a goer then.
JC
The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks