Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64

Thread: Hydrogen electric vehicles doing 2000kms

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Plenty of solar panels in Germany, where it also snows.
    And plenty of coal power in Poland which they buy.
    Germany has not improved the percentage of renewables over several years , mainly because they have to buy coal power from Poland.

    Regards Philip A

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    .....

    I am afraid panels don't work in the north of the USA as they are covered in snow for weeks at a time.

    ....
    Very soon even this issue has the potential to flip around in the near future.

    Possible graphene solar panel tech into the future.

    Watch the vid, at about the 5 min mark he explains that using graphene could potentially generate electrical energy due to water on the solar panel surface.
    Granted that conversion efficiency is extremely low(up to 6%) .. but any advance is better than none.
    Arthur.

    All these discos are giving me a heart attack!

    '99 D1 300Tdi Auto ( now sold :( )
    '03 D2 Td5 Auto
    '03 D2a Td5 Auto

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Crafers West South Australia
    Posts
    11,732
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Solar panels in high latitudes can be tilted to near vertical so snow mostly just slides off. Low temperatures are very good for panel output too, 25C is just a test temperature point. They are quite happy to work in sub zero conditions.

  4. #34
    DiscoMick Guest
    Plenty of people get sunburnt in the snow, so UV is still happening.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is ironic....driving a Prius into the drive through of Maccas to get a Big Mac that is now available 24 hours a day...

    https://www.google.com/url'sa=t&sour...CzkQYvOxEXUCVp

    Which Is Worse for the Planet: Beef or Cars? - EcoWatch

    Cow 'emissions' more damaging to planet than CO2 from cars | The Independent

    The answers are pretty simple. Less meat/No meat and veggies (that take also a small fraction of the water and land requirements of raising meat) and keep driving existing vehicles and save MASSIVE amounts of dollars at least and until battery tech has blitzed the current crop of batteries and transition slowly and in a way which people and economies can afford (Oh...side benefit we save billions on the heart and obesity epidemic alone).

    Cheers

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This thread has veered right off topic, but I found this little clip that shows what snow can be like in the USA, Although this is New Brunswick in Canada.

    No solar panels to be seen , but I think they would not be producing much for quite a while if they were there.

    I think it is amusing that posters nearly always quote the "next big thing" about solar which really ignores reality and economics. How much will graphine panels cost for example when/if they ever get to mass production. How much to solar roof tiles cost?
    I haven't seen glowing reports in the media so I wonder if they are successful in marketing terms.

    Also what will solar panels do to insurance rates once insurance companies wake up to how vulnerable they are to hail. There is a street in Wamberal ( Windsor Road)where 80% of the panels remain broken after a storm a couple of months ago. The nearby Breakers club has scores of panels which I thought at first glance were OK , but the news is that many were damaged.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4BlEB9sYIU

    Regards Philip A



  7. #37
    DiscoMick Guest
    If hail was severe enough to break the strong glass on solar panels then that would be the least of their problems.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Knowing how insurance companies work,the will just take solar panels out of the policy.

    Simple.

    Or charge an exorbitant rate to have them in the policy,particularly on a commercial property.

    I would also be concerned about them being ripped off roofs in storms and becoming missiles.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,916
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    Plenty of people get sunburnt in the snow, so UV is still happening.
    You might get sunburnt but doesn't mean you can argue - "hey it might be cloudy but what about the all the UV that gets through the clouds to the solar panels, they will still work".

    1) They are not particularly efficient at UV wavelengths.
    2) Protective screens over the cell (glass) don't transmit UV well.
    3) As a proportion of total energy in sunlight, the fraction UV & shorter wave length reaching the earth surface is <10% of the total.

    You can probably engineer the effects of points 1 and 2 to mitigate the problem but you can't change the physics of point 3. Most energy reaching the earth's surface is IR and visible light. Sweet FA is UV.

    The Solar Spectrum And Why “UV Solar Panels” Are A Con Job
    2024 RRS on the road
    2011 D4 3.0 in the drive way
    1999 D2 V8, in heaven
    1984 RRC, in hell

  10. #40
    DiscoMick Guest
    Never had any insurance company question our solar panels when arranging insurance on our properties.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!