Thread: EV general discussion

there's no 'rapid rush to change' this is the sort of thing deniers come up with as a counterargument to any change. Decarbonising the grid is essential for continued human existence and it has the bonus of making life better for everyone from the richest to the poorest.

Originally Posted by Arapiles

No, many birds (and bats) don't migrate at those heights, and it's actually a real issue: I advised on a particular wind farm in Europe which was on a migration route and the danger that it posed to birds was a serious concern.

Do you have similar concerns about tall buildings and large trees?

What was your role on the wind farm project?

Originally Posted by Homestar

That’s great and they’ll be plenty of case like this, but there’ll also be plenty of cases opposite to this I think.

And you kind of proved my point about the haves and have nots with your post as well - not having a go at that, I’m not in the latter category myself and I’ve been trying to do similar at our house - to the point we have cut our heating bill by around 80% this Winter - we only use the heater for one quick warm up of the house on a cold night and that’s it - most nights we don’t even have it on at all, but all of this talk about EV’s and how to power them, batteries, solar etc is the domain of the well off, no Joe Blogs living from one pay to the next. They will be the ones that hurt the most from this rapid rush to change and the overall monumental cost that goes with it.

Daily 12kwh in my dreams , If only I could delete the bloody swimming pool , Even during winter the pump runs 2 hours a day, Ive just had the smart idea to have it run at night so it does not reduce our solar feed in , We get about $0.70 FIT & buy at about $0.23

In this bill cycle we have only had 2 sunny days & its been freezing so have heaters on in the house.

Usage high on Sept 1 because I put 18kwh into the Landy , (but as you can see that's a lot cheaper than petrol) Usually charge once every 4-5 days. Obviously charge at night .

Screen Shot 2022-09-05 at 10.15.20 am.jpg Screen Shot 2022-09-05 at 10.16.43 am.jpg

Im not sure about the 'haves and have nots' argument. Check out Toorak or Vaclause on google earth Lowest take up of solar panels compared to less well off areas. They don't give a ****e about energy prices , yet are a high consumer of Teslas (and LandRovers too)

Originally Posted by goingbush

Daily 12kwh in my dreams , If only I could delete the bloody swimming pool , Even during winter the pump runs 2 hours a day, Ive just had the smart idea to have it run at night so it does not reduce our solar feed in , We get about $0.70 FIT & buy at about $0.23

In this bill cycle we have only had 2 sunny days & its been freezing so have heaters on in the house.

Usage high on Sept 1 because I put 18kwh into the Landy , (but as you can see that's a lot cheaper than petrol) Usually charge once every 4-5 days. Obviously charge at night .

Screen Shot 2022-09-05 at 10.15.20 am.jpg Screen Shot 2022-09-05 at 10.16.43 am.jpg

Im not sure about the 'haves and have nots' argument. Check out Toorak or Vaclause on google earth Lowest take up of solar panels compared to less well off areas. They don't give a ****e about energy prices , yet are a high consumer of Teslas (and LandRovers too)

Not wrong about the pretty dirt and dust free Landrover/Rangrovers know as Toorak Tractors

I use a lot above avg power I guess with work 20 to 40kWh per day and home not that far behind - no gas- The rotten vaccine fridges get opened a lot recently for a reason or two some might know about My overflow vaccine fridge is at home.

Disco is in to Ritta for a service on Thursday. Love them - I know I have seen them a lot less and spent a LOT less over the last 25000 ev km traveled.

Originally Posted by Homestar

I must be looking at this wrong, but if you use your EV as battery storage for the house, then should the power go out for more than a few minutes (say a tree over a line and 6 to 8 hours off supply) then unless you’re very aware of your power usage that car isn’t going to go very far the next day if needed. If you just want to run the fridge and freezer, some lighting and the TV then fine but on a hot night when the powers out I can see a car powering an AC system for a few hours before it runs out then someone complaining bitterly the next morning when they can’t get to the Coffee Shop for their morning Latte and smashed avo.

First world problem I guess for those that can afford it - that subject alone is worth a post of its own as the poor will get left behind and cop an unfair share of the **** sandwich like always…

May be. I did forget to add charge last Thursday so my disco when for a quick run

Victron multiplus inverters give me email warning for every fault, grid failure and grid restore at work. It is also has a lot of configuration options on when, where and what to do. The goodwe hybrid I had before the Victrons could do a lot as well. I can set how much to take from the batteries and how much/when to charge them and this can and does change if the Grid is off of course.

158 GIGA battery factories in EU, China, Korea and the US should make it very interesting to watch.

Post in Nuclear thread re California. Its government action 25 years ago saw Solar panel prices plummet all over the world. Batteries will take a similar trajectory and similar improvement path "Swanson's law" is about right I think. The Swanson Effect or Swanson's Law is named after Richard Swanson who founded the American solar-cell manufacturer SunPower.

He did have a vested interest of course.

Originally Posted by akelly

there's no 'rapid rush to change' this is the sort of thing deniers come up with as a counterargument to any change. Decarbonising the grid is essential for continued human existence and it has the bonus of making life better for everyone from the richest to the poorest.

Telling your population that they can't buy an ICE powered vehicle in 13 year (as has happened in California) when there isn't a viable alternative or the power to make battery EV's workable for most of the population at an affordable price seems pretty rapid to me - 2009 wasn't that long ago, and 2035 will come up pretty quickly when there is only a fraction of a percent of the infrastructure that will be required and no way of getting to what is needed in the forecast period.

And why is it that as soon as I point out issues that will arise (From experience, not by being a keyboard warrior and looking at Faceplant articles), I get these sort of comments 'Denier' and 'EV Hater' - I AM NEITHER OF THESE THINGS and I resent the implication to be honest so if you think I'm on my high horse, I wish all the one eyed EV lovers that won't even accept the discussion about the issues that are arising from them would get off theirs as well - IMO this group are worse that the 'deniers' as you call them.

I thought the discussion here could be had without name calling but that doesn't seem to be the case unfortunately.

I'm also all ears for you to tell me how we can decarbonise the grid within the next 25 years as well - because if you know how you'll have solved all the worlds problems. Do we need to? Absolutely - can we in the timeframes being talked about - not a chance.

Originally Posted by Homestar

So you have to buy an electric car within a few years but you’re advised not to charge it at high demand times. Anyone else see an issue here?

No issue. Just get a big generator to charge your car during peak times.

Originally Posted by Homestar

Telling your population that they can't buy an ICE powered vehicle in 13 year (as has happened in California) when there isn't a viable alternative or the power to make battery EV's workable for most of the population at an affordable price seems pretty rapid to me - 2009 wasn't that long ago, and 2035 will come up pretty quickly when there is only a fraction of a percent of the infrastructure that will be required and no way of getting to what is needed in the forecast period.

And why is it that as soon as I point out issues that will arise (From experience, not by being a keyboard warrior and looking at Faceplant articles), I get these sort of comments 'Denier' and 'EV Hater' - I AM NEITHER OF THESE THINGS and I resent the implication to be honest so if you think I'm on my high horse, I wish all the one eyed EV lovers that won't even accept the discussion about the issues that are arising from them would get off theirs as well - IMO this group are worse that the 'deniers' as you call them.

I thought the discussion here could be had without name calling but that doesn't seem to be the case unfortunately.

I'm also all ears for you to tell me how we can decarbonise the grid within the next 25 years as well - because if you know how you'll have solved all the worlds problems. Do we need to? Absolutely - can we in the timeframes being talked about - not a chance.

I think the ban is on "New ICE" vehicles in California and we have to start somewhere, CA. has always been a leader see CAFE fuel efficiency standard which I like to think of as CA(lifornia)Fuel Efficiency standard which a lot of US states and even countries later followed, these things take longer than people think, to wit Aus. doesn't even have a fuel efficiency standard yet.

In WWII even Winston Churchill thought Britain might be invaded hence his "we shall fight them on the beaches" speech, but 5 years later they had won, and we have 25 years.