
 Originally Posted by 
Tombie
					 
				 
				Chatting with an owner, perhaps you can confirm…
Tesla Model 3 Long Range.
Owner says he was told / recommended to use 80-90% charge to help preserve the battery life.  Supercharging is hard on the battery and shortens this life if used regularly and a 7kwh is the preferred option?
In 3 years and nearing 100,000km he’s down 15% below the claimed range (according to dash) and in reality gets less than that with 400-425km the normal (quoted 629km)
This vehicle is used regularly for runs to his shack up here near Whyalla from Adelaide, so for those runs is charged to 100% and he’s getting close to not making it on a single charge.  Eg, once he gets to the shack he’s on charge overnight before he heads into town.  His solution is a small 4cyl runabout for when he gets here.
He loves the power, handling and comfort.  And back home it’s perfect for him - he has an 18kwh array and 3 Tesla batteries on his house so no charge issues.
My question: Are people really willing to accept spending such money on a vehicle that is <80% capable of its claim and then within 5 years is even less capable again?
People went mental when phones started losing charge capacity.  These current EVs don’t even seem to start with the capability claimed and slide quite notably from there.
I’m also puzzled how one of the big statistics companies quotes (USD) a Tesla annual maintenance cost about 15-20% higher than the average of other similar sized vehicles?  Besides a check over, maybe some greasing, battery coolant service etc. what’s the annual cost?
Sure, tyres, what else?  And at end of warranty kms allow a full suspension replacement - that’s just wear and tear and should be done…
			
		 
	
Bookmarks